Answer: If the material is reworked and sold, Hodge Inc. has a financial disadvantage of (- 4500).
Let's see why:
1) If we sell the material at its disposal value: We have a cost of $ 74600 and the income from sale would be $ 57400 =
57400 - 74600 = (-17200). We have a loss of $17200.
2) If we rework the material we will have an original cost of $ 74600, an additional cost for reworking of $ 1500 and the income from its sale would be $ 54400 =
54400 - (74600 + 1500) = (-21700) We have a loss of $ 21700.
Then comparing the 2 situations =
(-21700) - (-17200) = -4500. There is a financial disadvantage of $4,500 if the material is reworked instead of selling it as scrap.
Answer:
A)
Bank reconciliation:
Bank balance Augusts 31 $18,340
+ Deposits in transit $2,830
<u>- Outstanding checks $3,520</u>
Reconciled bank account $17,650
Cash balance reconciliation:
Cash balance August 31 $17,350
+ Error in recording check $360
<u>- Bank fees $60</u>
Reconciled cash account $17,650
B) Cash account balance $17,650
Answer: $3.10
Explanation:
The actual price per pound of direct materials purchased in June will be calculated as follows:
Let the actual price be represented by x.
Material price variance is calculated as:
= (standard price-actual price) × actual quantity
-2000 = (3 × 20000) - 20000x
-2000 = 60000 - 20000x
20000x = 60000 + 2000
20000x = 62000
x = 62000/20000
x = 3.1
Therefore, the actual price per pound of direct material bought in June is $3.10
When supply increases, the supply curve shifts to the right.
<h3>What is the supply curve?</h3>
This is the curve that is used to show the amount of goods that the producers would be able to make available for the market at a particular price. The supply curve shifts to the right when there is an increase in supply in the economy.
Hence this answers our question by saying that When supply increases, the supply curve shifts to the right.
Read more on supply curve here: brainly.com/question/11717727
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. National-security argument
Explanation:
The National-security argument is also known as the National-defense argument. The argument proposes the imposition of high tariffs on locally manufactured goods so that the country would not be dependent on other countries for those goods in the event of war. For example, if a country is dependent on other counties for the production of food, then it would be in great danger in the advent of war. Tires that are also used to prepare weapons should be sourced within a country so that in the advent of war, the country would not be dependent on others.
This is the argument employed by the congresswoman who sought the imposition of a tariff on tires so that the United States would not be dependent on other foreign countries during a war.
