Answer:
(a) the social costs of pollution reduction becoming greater than the benefits
Explanation:
Anti-pollution policies are put in place by a government to fight and reduce pollution in a country or state.
If these policies are overaggressively designed and implemented, <u>then the benefits that should have been observed by the society from the anti-pollution endeavor will be outweighed by the costs.</u>
<h3>
<u>Question:</u></h3>
All of the following are formal or informal sources of presidential power except
a. presidential authority to raise revenue
b. presidential access to the media
c. precedents set during previous administrations
d. public support
e. the constitution
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
All the mentioned options are formal or informal sources of Presidential power except the Presidential authority to raise revenue.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The powers to raise a revenue is not given to the presidential authority. This is because raising funds occurs when a bill is passed from both the houses of the parliament. A direct implementation of the raise in revenue in a democratic country by a single person or authority would be a sign of dictatorship.
Living in the world's largest democracy, a single raise in any tax or revenue is gone through two houses of the parliament and then it is approved by the government. It is a chain that works and not a single person or authority.
Answer:
Use the court system
Explanation:
In order to challenge a new law as a citizen you need to use the court system. The citizen in question would need to file a class action lawsuit in court seeking to declare the federal law unconstitutional. This is then reviewed and decided by the courts, where the Supreme Court ultimately has the final verdict on this issue.
Answer:
To the question realized, the correct option is:
- True.
Explanation:
In any project, <em>the budget must be preliminary and subject to changes</em>, the reason is that in the execution of the project, can appear so many inconvenient that has an additional cost and the executor or builder can not take over all the responsibility (overall in-state projects), in some projects <em>the contractor could increase the cost in a 30% of the total cost of the project by this reason</em>.
If you are talking about the English Civil War, then the answer is Royalists.
