1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
2 years ago
11

What efforts have been undertaken in Nepal to develop skilled human resource for bringing social and economic development?

Social Studies
1 answer:
givi [52]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

they are giving proper education to people

You might be interested in
How can writers in our networked world enhance their credibility?
zheka24 [161]
Answer:

D. By including details and statistics
7 0
3 years ago
How was the People of South Africa treated by white government in their own land
mojhsa [17]

Answer:

Unfair treatment

Explanation:

South Africa was governed by the white despite being less in population compared to the people of South Africa. The white government issued several policies that separated the South Africans from the white communities. People of South Africa were treated unfairly because of their race and colour which according to the white were inferior compare to them. Apartheid introduced in 1948 by the National Party government. Apartheid separates the development of racial groups in South Africa. South Africans required to live in separate areas from whites. Land Acts issued that allowed the white to hold more land in the country.

7 0
2 years ago
What is securalism? ​
sineoko [7]

I've heard individuals say things like, "You have to be secular," "I am secular," etc. even in academic contexts. Then there are some who despise secularism as the ruin of this nation. Secularism is viewed as a moral value by the pro-Secularism camp. According to the anti-Secilarim camp, it is equivalent to minoritarianism.

Both parties are mistaken and misinformed.

First and foremost, we need to understand that secularism is NOT for INDIVIDUALS. For the SYSTEM, that is.

Since secularism and religious freedom are mutually exclusive, no constitution that protects religious freedom can also impose secularism on its citizens. A separation from religion is secularism. It is the system, not the individual, that is required to dissociate.

The term "System" designates the complete administrative framework, including each of its constituent and contributing parts. The System includes everything that has to do with administration, formulation and application of policy, and law and justice. These must all be unbiased toward religion. The secular discipline also applies to the political organizations that take part in the process of electing the legislative bodies. Therefore, when a political party makes the claim that it is "secular," it is attempting the age-old ruse of constructing a virtue out of a need. It cannot be anything but secular. Similar to this, a government cannot avoid being secular. The courts, bureaucracy, and legislature all operate similarly. When we refer to ourselves as a "secular nation," we mean this.

Being Secular entails being cut off from Religion. This is a requirement of the Government, not of the people who make up the Government. The same is true of the other institutions that make up the democratic system. Secularism is an institution's character, not the personality of its employees. For instance, the Prime Minister must maintain his secularity while doing his official duties, but not in his personal life. Although the members who make up a political party are allowed to follow their faith, the essence of the organization's operations must be secular. Most individuals are unaware of this.

Secularism, as a constitutional ideal, is, nevertheless, consistently violated by the political and administrative establishments, both in letter and in spirit. A secular government cannot use its policies and programs to favor or disparage any religion. However, we see that governments, both at the federal level and at the state level, flagrantly break this cardinal rule by enacting religiously-specific social assistance programs that favor certain people while excluding others. Other fundamental protections, such equality and the prohibition of discrimination based on race, religion, or other factors, are also infringed as a result. This flagrant constitutional breach is not questioned or opposed.

The canvassing of votes in the name of religion is expressly prohibited. This is what the law says:

<em>"Section 123(3) of the Act* prohibits canvassing by an electoral candidate to woo voters in the name of race, caste, religion, community and language. It also prohibits usage of religious symbols or national symbols or flag for canvassing purposes. Usage of the aforesaid are considered to be corrupt practices. The electoral candidates cannot promise any public policy which they propose to implement on being successful."</em>

<em />

[*The 'Act' refers to the Representation of the People Act 1951]

Despite the fact that this is the law, the reality during election season is the complete reverse. Why doesn't anyone challenge it? Why doesn't anyone care about it? Every day we chant hymns to secularism, yet when it comes to actual practice, we disrespect it in spirit and soul. That is the major flaw in our democratic system.

Secularism itself is not the bad guy; its improper use is.

Thank you,

Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on records from ancient Athens, each year young Athenian women collaborated to weave a new woolen robe that they used to d
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

The correct option is D

Explanation:

Option A and C makes the same mistake. The use of "woolen robe that they used" makes it seem as though the woolen robe was a tool used to help them dress their goddess so it is wrong.

While Option B addresses the issue with option A using a "with which" instead of "that", however the use of past perfect tense "had collaborated" eliminates both Option B and Option E.

Option D addresses all the problems mentioned in the other options.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the war affect different groups of Americans?
Luba_88 [7]
As men went to war mang women took their husbands places running homes,farms,family, and business Hope this give you a idea about what I'm trying to say
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Wendy is running the weekly staff meeting at Janus Services. Brad, a coworker, is unprepared for the meeting and doesn't have th
    9·1 answer
  • TRUE OR FALSE. Muslims consider the Shariah to be the exact word of God as it was told to Muhammad.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the rationale of the U.S. government for the particular geographic borders of the reservations for the Southeastern tri
    10·1 answer
  • . A meta-analysis is A) a combination of results from many related studies. B) an alternative to the strong inference approach.
    7·1 answer
  • 3. Conclude the impact the Germanic barbarians such as the Vandals, Angles, Saxons, Huns, and Visigoths had on the fall of Rome.
    8·1 answer
  • Help please <br> match each term with its definition
    8·2 answers
  • Write the polar diameter of earth
    11·2 answers
  • Https://survey.fynzo.com/u/jj2qg1​
    8·1 answer
  • Si en tu escuela existiera el acoso escolar o BULLYING, ¿ qué mecanismos de participación estudiantil utilizarías para soluciona
    12·1 answer
  • Introspection, a research tool used by early psychologists, is a technique which involves:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!