The pros of an embargo are usually that the country which has it imposed changes their ways. Since embargos are usually introduced in cases where a nation violates human rights or prevents democracy or similar things, the pros are that the embargo is a motivation for the government that depends on trade to change their ways to become more democratic.
Cons are that they are often ineffective for various reasons. For example, a country may be fully self-sufficient so it doesn't care if it has an embargo since it can fulfill the needs of the people regardless. Another is also if the people are willing to suffer from being in an embargo out of spite for those who introduced the embargo so they don't change their ways.<span />
answer :<em>In about 30 years, the Carrera da India, or the Portuguese India trade run would decline, making way for the British East India Company trade. They would set up a base further North of the Malabar coast, in Surat and start exporting calico to England in 1621 CE.</em>
<em>hope this answer will help you!!!!</em>
It was the "Glass-Steagall Banking Act" that established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), with the greater goal of restoring public confidence in the banking system, since many Americans before this did not trust banks with their money.
The answer would be <span>A. poor white farmers </span>