Answer:
The answer is: b
Explanation:
In long-run equilibrium, the long run aggregate demand curve and aggregate supply curve intersect where the marginal revenue (revenue derived from selling an additional unit) and marginal cost (cost incurred from producing) an additional unit) are equal. In the long-run equilibrium, this intersection occurs at the lowest point of the long-run average total cost curve (curve depicting the average cost per unit of production).
Holding all else constant, short run changes in the economy would not change the potential output levels. The long-run aggregate supply curve would remain fixed at the potential level of output. However, these changes: international tensions, corporate scandals and loss of confidence in policymakers would cause shifts in the aggregate demand curve since demand would be adversely affected.
Consumer confidence is the perspective or outlook that consumers have on the state of the economy. The destabilising factors given in this scenario would raise the levels of uncertainty and perceived risk, reducing the confidence levels of consumers and ultimately resulting in reduced demand. In long-run equilibrium, when demand is reduced, it is indicated by a leftward shift in the aggregate demand curve.
a) Yes, $67 exceeds the loss—minimizing output.
Using the MR
They will produce 9 units.
Profits per unit = $67 - $50 = $17
Total profit =
$153.
(b) Yes, $42 exceeds the loss—minimizing output.
Using the MR
They will produce 6 units
Loss per unit is = $42 - $47.50 = $5.50
Total loss = $33 (= 6 x $5.50), which is less than the total fixed cost of $60.
c) No, because $33 is less than AVC. If it did produce, the quantity will be 4—By producing 4 units, it would lose $78 [= 4 ($33 - $52.50)]. and if they didn't produce, it would lose only the total fixed cost of $60.
The limits of the terms of trade are determined by the comparative cost conditions in each country before trade:
Less commerce occurs as a result of partial specialization and rising costs than when costs are constant. The cost advantage one country has over another serves as the foundation for commerce. This explains why some countries make things that they also import since they are able to do so for less money than their trading partners.
What is comparative cost ?
Comparative costs refers to comparing, using a comparative costs approach, the costs of signing into a privatized contract to the expenses of the state maintaining to provide the services that are the subject of the contract.
Therefore,
Less commerce occurs as a result of partial specialization and rising costs than when costs are constant. The cost advantage one country has over another serves as the foundation for commerce. This explains why some countries make things that they also import since they are able to do so for less money than their trading partners.
To learn more about comparative cost from the given link:
brainly.com/question/8141905
Answer:
B. All of these are correct.
Explanation:
- The restriction must not be more broad than is necessary to serve the substantial government interest.
- The restriction must directly advance the substantial government interest.
- The government interest that will be advanced by the restriction must be substantial.
