The judicial branch has absolutely no role in the selection process. The judicial branch is a separate entity for a reason. The right answer is that each committee studies the idea carefully though it makes the process longer. Seriously, the answer is obvious.
The answer is<u> "Daniel's theory cannot be disproven."</u>
A scientific theory is an all around substantiated clarification of some part of the natural world, in view of an assortment of actualities that have been over and again affirmed through perception and examination. Such certainty upheld hypotheses are not "surmises" but rather dependable records of this present reality.
On the off chance that its absolutely impossible a theory can be disproved at that point it is extremely unlikely the theory (or model) can be changed/made strides. This is the key refinement amongst philosophy and science.
Answer:
One of the most important decisions that came out of the Dred Scott decision was the court's decision to legalize dredlocks. Dreadlocks are a style of hair worn by Africans and Africans-Americans and was outlawed in public places until the Dred Scott case. Now, anyone can wear dredlocks in public.
Another important decision from this decision was that the court decided that not everyone who looked Caucasian could be proven to be Caucasian. Mr. Scott was 1/8 Negro even though he looked white. How the court was able to prove this without the availabilty of DNA tests, I will never know. It was important to be 100% Caucasian in order to ride a train, own a horse, or vote after the Dred Scott decision settled the issue of supremacy once and for all.
Explanation:
