Answer:
Acta Diurna
Acta Diurna (Latin: Daily Acts sometimes translated as Daily Public Records) were daily Roman official notices, a sort of daily gazette. They were carved on stone or metal and presented in message boards in public places like the Forum of Rome. They were also called simply Acta.
Explanation:
The correct answer that best describes the rule of law is option B. The process of setting precedent through the different levels of the courts.
Because the rule of law tells us that all activities carried out must be guaranteed by law.
Answer:
She succeed in convincing her daughter
Explanation:
The mother of the daughter has actually succeeded in convincing the girl in trying to eat different variety of foods, its been a year she noticed that, a year is a long time to convince a small child in doing something ,so she shouldnt be surprised if a year later she sees the daughter trying out a dish she never had fair to try before. So the mother succeeded in convincing the daughter in trying out different dishes that is why the Anty was surprised to see her eating a sliced plate of curried goat.
Answer:
24 time zones. The world is divided into 24 time zones.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
