1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timofeeve [1]
3 years ago
9

How has patriotism been used as a weapon in the past? Be specific and verbose

History
1 answer:
pychu [463]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Patriotism has always been an important political concept in Polish public discourse. During country's partitions (1795-1918) and under the communist rule it was one of the 'integrating forces' (Polakiewicz) and tools to maintain national identity and oppose the imposed regime. After 1989 its role becomes manifold. While multiple intellectuals still debate about its essence and usefulness in public sphere and try to elaborate a new patriotic formula for times of peace, increasingly the debates over its meaning become political. One could even conclude that it might be an 'essentially contested' concept (W.B. Gallie), or rather that actors from different ideological sides try to use it to their advantage and achieve their political goals with it. Labeling oneself 'the real patriot' and refusing this label to others in the process of monopolisation of patriotism (Bar-Tal) demonstrates how an allegedly subjective feeling can be used in the political realm, and how strong emotions such process can bring about. The analysis is based on a number of empirical debates about patriotism, e.g. the last up to date that occurred in 2010 after the crash of presidential aircraft in Katyn. The analysis will also compare whether more theoretical debates from the initial stage of the democratic transition had an impact on living the national mourning and expressing patriotism in the wake of such a national trauma.

Explanation:

its a bit long but hope it helps

You might be interested in
A government is laissez-faire when it
s344n2d4d5 [400]

<u>Original Question</u>: A government is laissez-faire when it?

<u>Answer: does not interfere with business affairs and does not regulate its actions</u>

<u></u>

<em>Explanation: Laissez-faire is an economic term that economists use when describing an unregulated market</em>

<em>An unregulated market in being the fact that the government doesn't involve us in the business world.</em>

<em>Its benefit is that allows for substantial growth in the industry as businesses are not bound by rules and regulations could increase the cost and decrease their efficiency.</em>

<em>However it is unbeneficial when businesses began to set up 'monoplies' and 'set inadequate working standards' that harm other businesses and workers. That is when the government would step in to regulate the market and break the laissez-faire terms on how to run a market.</em>

<em />

Hope that helps!

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0
2 years ago
Martin Luther said that people only need to recognize Christ to get to heaven, but that the Pope can also tell people how to get
maxonik [38]
False it doesn't matter if you do or don't know him. ;p

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
First is brainliest :)
erik [133]

Answer:

j

Explanation:

28

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE AWNSWER CORRECTLY AND DONT JUST COPY AND PASTE FROM G00GLE I WILL GIVE BRANLIEST TO WHOEVER IS RIGHT
Alenkinab [10]
I only know the answer for the last one

Well the absence of cash or also independent credit system did lead to the creation of sharecropping. And the high interest rates did unpredictable harvest and also unscrupulous landlords and many merchants and often kept tenant families severely indebted. And that then lead for the debt to then be carried over until the next year or then years coming.

Hopefully this helped
6 0
3 years ago
Use the drop-down menus to complete each sentence. Land, labor, and capital also are known as factors of. Economies must answer
Flura [38]

Answer:

Land, labor, and capital also are known as factors of <u>Production.</u>

Factors of production help in the production of goods and services to convert raw materials into finished goods. There are 4 of them including land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship.

Economies must answer the three economic questions because resources are <u>Limited.</u>

There are 3 fundamental economic questions that should be answered before goods and services are produced so that the economy in question can be able to prioritize. These questions are; What to Produce, How, and for Whom?

<u />

If an economy does not answer the three economic questions, resources may <u>Run Out</u><u>. </u>

As the economy has scarce resources, the aforementioned questions should be used to prioritize ventures in such a way that the resources that are available are channelled towards the most efficient of those ventures otherwise the resources might run out.

<u />

<u>Negative</u> Consequences can result when an economy does not answer the three economic questions .

If the economy fails to answer the questions, there will be negative consequences as resources will become scarce and the economy will suffer because production will reduce and the people in the economy become worse off as a result.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was the Scientific Revolution a threat to the Church?
    14·1 answer
  • Is blood sugar regulated by negative or positive feedback? explain your answer?
    7·1 answer
  • What were the first food sources that human beings farmed?
    12·1 answer
  • Which were beliefs or practices of the early Hebrews? Choose all answers that are correct. A. Abraham was a great leader, but no
    15·2 answers
  • Read your textbook's “Sources from the Past” section on Christopher Columbus’ first impressions of American peoples. Answer the
    14·1 answer
  • 4. What form of government is evident in the scenario below?
    11·2 answers
  • What allowed the allies to win the war
    6·1 answer
  • Who gave the Resolute Desk to president Rutherford B. Hayes as a token of goodwill
    15·1 answer
  • What is history? Has that meaning changed over time or largely remained the same? Does it differ in different regions of the wor
    14·1 answer
  • How did religious issues contributed to political unrest in England in the 17th century.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!