1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Virty [35]
3 years ago
14

As a result of the Federal Insanity Reform act of 1984 the following is true?

Law
1 answer:
Molodets [167]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C.) allowed the person to walk free if the verdict was not guilty by reason of insanity.

Explanation:

The Federal Insanity Reform act of 1984 is a reform act which allow a defendant who is the person who committed a crime to work freely if the decision of the jury was that the defendant was not found guilty by reason of Insanity or mental illness and therefore should not be blame or punished for the crime committed.

Therefore the Federal Insanity Reform act of 1984 allowed the person to walk free if the verdict was NOT GUILTY by reason of INSANITY.

You might be interested in
How are other countries doing when it comes to female representation in the police force compared to the US?
DanielleElmas [232]

Pursuing gender equality is both an international legal obligation and necessary to achieve national development goals. For police services, integrating a gender perspective is fundamental to protect rights in the workplace, and make policing more effective, societies safer and the rule of law stronger.

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP A HOMIE OUT!
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

I believe the answer is #1

Explanation:

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.

Hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
3 years ago
The main responsibility of the lieutenant governor is to __________. A. audit the state budget B. check the power of the governo
Klio2033 [76]
C. Serve as the leader of the state senate
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who paid the largest criminal fine in history and why?
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
Pfizer paid $1billion to resolve allegations under the civil False Claims Act that the company illegally promoted four drugs—Bextra, anti-psychotic drug Geodon, antibiotic Zyvox, and anti-epileptic drug Lyrica
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is this in Spanish
    10·2 answers
  • What are the 3 levels of<br> government?
    10·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST (multiple choice)
    12·1 answer
  • Why is capital punishment still used?
    10·1 answer
  • A ____ alleges that even if the facts as presented in the plaintiffs complaint are true, There is no reason to continue the laws
    14·1 answer
  • The FBI collects which crime statistics?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the difference between a universal defense and a personal defense?
    13·1 answer
  • "How are both physical evidence and testimonial evidence used in a court of law?"
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the Functions of Law.Give appropriate example
    12·1 answer
  • The power of a jury in a criminal case to ignore a law and to return a verdict according to its conscience is called
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!