Answer:
House search
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment requires a warrant be based on probable cause, and must describe the persons and places to be searched as well as the items to be seized. A judicial warrant (often called a criminal warrant) is used by police to search a person or place for evidence of a crime.
Answer:
A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.
In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.
Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. Most of the executives were secretly blue-collar workers.
B. Companies were careful never to violate American law.
C. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was unintentional.
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Answer:
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
Edwin Sutherland was surprised to discover scenes of corruption and violation of laws within American industries. He was even more surprised when he discovered that these violations were done intensionally, promoting the benefit of entrepreneurs who had no commitment to order and honesty. These crimes are known as White Collar and are made by people who already live a wealthy life and without economic difficulties.
Answer:
There is no passage
Explanation:
When there is i will edit this one
Answer:
Yes, against Sally only.
Explanation:
With the information given in the question, Ann´s lawsuit will not proceed after Donny´s defendant raise the defenses of limitations.
A statute of limitations looks to set a maximum time after which an event could be legally imported and a lawsuit against it will pass.
A statute of repose limits the time that an action could be brought back because of a particular event.
The bad things that happened to Ann were in 2018 so, for the car accident she had until 2020 to initiate a lawsuit.
On the other hand, the statute of repose began to run once the affected notice the problem that the particular event, in this case, the negligence from Sally, is caused. Ann noticed the pain on her elbow in 2020 so she had until 2030 to initiate a lawsuit.
I hope this answer helps you.
