Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.
<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>
Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.
Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.
So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.
Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909
Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members
Other biased sources include the following:
- Political party members of the President,
- Previous schools the current President attended,
- Family of the current President
- The political party the President belonged to,
- The special assistants to the current President, etc.
The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20646239
Answer:
B. realización de elecciones
Explanation:
Explanation:
The range is usually from one year for many misdemeanors, three years for many felonies, to no time limit at all for crimes that are punishable by death or by life in prison. If there is no statute of limitations, the prosecutor may bring charges against someone at any time.
