Answer:
Individual Privacy vs. National Security The need to protect National Security is far more important than individual privacy. The country is the freedom that we have. That freedom and the right to live freely is protected by various government agencies. From time to time, the privacy a person has may have to be invaded to guarantee the security of the country and other citizens.
Answer:
A lot of people who have committed crimes tend to get lifetime charges even though they could have had personal problems. People in court systems tend to ignore clear signs of mental issues or trauma in a victim of a lifetime system if it means a family can get some sort of relief over the situation. Its rather unfair but what can be changed about it? Even if the victim were to be put into a mental institute it wouldn't do much for them, sadly. In most places such as a mental hospital, the person who was sent after commiting a crime will be put into harsh placements and won't get most of the help they need. And if anything is done for them and they are finally fit for jail it can still effect the victim harshly.
Explanation:
It’s A because of the law
Answer:
dang...
Explanation:
well, don't worry. I don't copy and paste c.ra.p everywhere-
I agree, spamming is definitely not the right way to protest since peaceful people just trying to get help on their work are being affected by this.
may I have Brainliest? I'm stuck on Expert ( ╯︿╰ )
As he committed crimes that can be tried in State court, the last Texas Court to hear John's case is the <u>Texas Supreme Court. </u>
<h3>Which court is John's final court?</h3>
In every state there exists a judicial system that is similar to the federal system because there is a Supreme Court.
The state Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in a state which means that the final court for John in the state of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court.
Find out more on supreme courts at brainly.com/question/2324092.
