Answer:
the First one you listed. The officer has to give the Juvenile his or her Miranda Right for him or her to remain silent
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Utterly true.
I once asked my wife to teach me to draw an Erlenmeyer flask. She showed me, and she's a good teacher. Then she said "Draw 50 of these. By the time you've done that, you should see how the lines work." She was wrong. My first flask was no worse nor better than the 50th one and I never did see how the lines worked.
I can do math, but my drawings look like I never graduated from Grade 1.
Answer:
GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu
The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.
1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.
2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.
3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.
Explanation:
GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.
Answer:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB)
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB) is a law that came into being to repeal existing laws so that banks, investment companies, and other financial services companies could merge. It was enacted in November 1999 by the 106th Congress of the United States.
This law is applicable to the entire insurance agents, brokers, and financial institutions and it highlights the rules around the privacy of information these agencies obtain from customers.
Answer:
So what is your question?
