1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scZoUnD [109]
3 years ago
9

PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE

Mathematics
2 answers:
Basile [38]3 years ago
5 0

Volume= 4188.7902 m^3

Rashid [163]3 years ago
4 0
R = 10 units

V=4/3(3.14)(r)^3

V=4/3(3.14)(10)^3

V=4/3(3.14)(1000)

V= 4(3.14)(1000)/3

V=12,560/3

V=4.188.79 un^3
You might be interested in
PLEASE SOLVE AND CHECK. SHOW COMPLETE SOLUTION
Kipish [7]

Answer:

i m not able to give the answer to you

4 0
2 years ago
Where is a major league ballpark in which the distance from home plate to the center-field fence and the height of the center fi
jonny [76]
Given:

A height of 2 feet above the ground and angle of elevation of 86 degrees. 

Assuming that the form of our problem is a right triangle, we can solve for the remaining angle:

180 - (90+86) = 4 degrees

The distance from the home plate to the centerfield is

2/sin 4 = x / sin 86

solve for x

x = 28.60 feet
  <span />
8 0
3 years ago
Bidduck21.... go frick urself &lt;3
Contact [7]
Who’s thattt IS THAT A BOT OR SOMETHINF AND DO U NEED HELP?
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag and drop the answer into the box to identify each function as linear, exponential, or neither.
katrin2010 [14]
<span>​x​ 2 3 4
f(x) 5.5 7 8.5 </span>

The first function is linear. When you subtract 5.5 from 7, you get 1.5 and when you subtract 7 from 8.5 you also get 1.5. That's how we know it's a linear function because there's clearly pattern. HOWEVER, if you had 5.5, 7, and 9 that would not be a linear function. Why? Because when you take away 7 from 9 you get 2. In order for it to be a linear function you have to get the same exact number when you subtract. 

<span>x​ 0 3 6
f(x) 1 8 64</span> 

The second function is exponential because when you divide you get the exact same number. 8/1 = 8 and 64/8 = 8. So this is exponential. But if you had 72 instead of 64 it would not be an exponential function because there has to be a pattern. 

I hope this makes sense. Btw I had this question on my test too and this is correct. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Simplify: 20 - (-2) to the second power ÷ ( 7 - 9) × 13
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

The answer to the statement provided is 46.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Work out the equation of the line which has a gradient of 1/2 and passes through the point (4,-2) ❗️THIS IS DUE PRETTY SOON SO H
    14·1 answer
  • The graph shows the distance Julian drives on a trip. What is Julian’s speed
    10·2 answers
  • Late shows Some TV shows begin after their scheduled times when earlier programs run late. According to a network’s records, abo
    9·1 answer
  • How to write Seven and three hundred seventeen thousandth in numbers?
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me with this question!!
    10·1 answer
  • A dinner party is being organized with the option of 7 dinner choices to serve at the venue. Since catering is expensive, the ho
    5·1 answer
  • I need help in this algebra problem plz
    12·1 answer
  • 3(7^2 * 3^4) SHOW WORK
    15·1 answer
  • Simplify the given expression below:<br> (1 + 3) + (2 - 5i)
    7·2 answers
  • Find the simplified trig ratio (fraction) of tan p
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!