Answer:
Employment, property and family law.
Explanation:
The ERA has to be considered in its historical context. It was first proposed in 1923, at a time where women had little or no rights regarding work and payment and faced discrimination. The ERA proposed a total abolition of law discrimination based on sex, which would have been revolutionary at the time. Later, during the 1960s and 1970s when the ERA was again discussed, some of the problems were solved with other laws, like the Equal Pay Act or the Civil Rights Acts. However, while these acts are a key part of American Legislation, the ERA is a Constitutional Amendment, which would give a completely new level of protection.
There is criticism, mainly because many of the laws and guarantees gained during the past 100 years have been tailored to protect women in their specificity. And many fear that the ERA would negatively override those protections. However, as an Amendment, any discrimination based on sex could be challenged based on unconstitutionality. And as of now, women still suffer discrimination and the acts and laws enacted so far are not sufficient.
This is true. By increasing the price, the consumers will become more aware of the scarce water supplies and they will pay more attention to th way they use water. Unfortunatelly, clean water is one of the resources that will be endangered in the future so we have to take care of the resources now.
Answer:
(1).Online audiences have more sources of distraction than do in-person audiences.
(2). Online speakers should dress casually because the audience is not physically present.
Explanation:
PLEASE TAKE NOTE:
For option (1) that is ''Online audiences have more sources of distraction than do in-person audiences". THIS IS THE (ONLY) ANSWER IF WE ARE TO CHOOSE ONLY ONE OPTION.
BUT if we are to choose more than one answers OPTION (1) AND (2) ARE THE BEST TWO ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION.
REASON:
(1).Online audiences have more sources of distraction than do in-person audiences: It is so easy for the Audience to get distracted by their phones or people knocking on their doors and many more. It is not easy to keep decorum.
(2). Online speakers should dress casually because the audience is not physically present : it is okay if an online speaker dresses casually but it will better if an online speaker dresses professionally as the audience will take them more seriously.
=> So, like I said earlier; if we are to choose only one option, the best option you have to choose is "Online audiences have more sources of distraction than do in-person audiences".
<span>This view holds that everything in human experience can be viewed in physical and chemical terms. It is a way of thinking heavily rooted in bioscience: that is, the components that make up the structure and function of our brains and selves are much more important than our learned experiences.</span>
