The number<span> is between integers, so it can't be an integer or a whole </span>number<span>. It's written as a ratio of two integers, so it's a </span>rational number<span> and not irrational. All</span>rational numbers<span> are real </span>numbers<span>, so this </span>number<span> is </span>rational<span> and real.</span>
Answer: A
Step-by-step explanation:
Following the first two steps of the sequence of transformations,
We need to map this onto D(1,1), which involves a translation 3 units right.
Answer:
1. a) Square
2. c) Rectangle
Step-by-step explanation:
1. If you cut this rectangular prism in way to be PERPENDICULAR to the base, that means you're cutting it straight down, from the top to the bottom, in a vertical line. The cross-section obtained will be just like an end of the prism, which in this case is a square. Because it's a regular rectangular prism, no matter where you cut it, as long as it's vertical, perpendicular to the base, you'll get a square due to this particular form. Technically, the answer could also be a rectangle, since a square is a rectangle.
2. you cut this rectangular prism in way to be PARALLEL to the base, that means you're cutting it straight, from the front to the back, in an horizontal line. The cross-section obtained will be just like an top of the prism, which in this case is a rectangle. Because it's a regular rectangular prism, no matter where you cut it, as long as it's an horizontal line, parallel to the base, you'll get a rectangle due to this particular form.
I believe the answers are:
(f o g) (2)= 1/17 and (f+g) (2)= 17.5
