Answer
Because of the shift away from media promoting, the dynamic interaction has changed incredibly. When media promoting was weighty with COSI and StarKist, customers had gotten used to seeing the advertisements and their separate symbols. Buyers were extremely faithful to a particular brand and the reliability outgrew the recognizable symbols "Charlie the Fish" and the mermaid for COSI. Since the center has moved to principally print advertisements, advancements coming up, and coupons, there is something else entirely to keep the customer dynamic cycle occupied. An item, for example, canned fish isn't a need, and in this way can without much of a stretch be supplanted by substitutes. There is more seriousness since a buyer could simply pick a brand since it is the least expensive at a specific store or in light of the fact that they discovered a coupon in a notice. Brand devotion is done being squeezed into shoppers' psyches through business spots with an agreeable mermaid. Presently, organizations are battling to offer more advancements or more limits to build deals, yet the outcome is that for certain buyers each excursion to the store could end with an alternate brand on fish being bought. Purchasers are presently being reached at home through paper advertisements, intelligent item sites, and different advancements. Clients might have settled on their choice before going on an outing to the store. Clients would have followed the Progressive system of Impacts Model before the promoting endeavors moved from media publicizing. Shoppers knew about the brands since they were faithful and fabricated inclinations after some time that prompted buying one brand over the other. Presently, the last buy isn't driven by dedication, however rather each buy has the customer taking a gander at a few components. The activities of retail deals, print advertisements, or different advancements influence their purchasing conduct.
 
        
             
        
        
        
<span>John would want to be the member as a limited partner. This would allow him to be an owner of the company and provide leadership (and also receive earnings) without being liable for the firm's debts. A limited liability corporation (LLC) allows for the owners to not be responsible for the debts of the firm.</span>
        
             
        
        
        
My answer would probably be B!
        
             
        
        
        
the answer is B, resolve conflicts peacefully
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
8.01%
Explanation:
Expected return on mutual fund = Risk-free rate + Market risk premium*Beta
Expected return on mutual fund = 3% + 7.7%*1
Expected return on mutual fund = 10.70%
Best estimate of the portfolio expected rate of return = Weight of  mutual fund*Expected return on mutual fund + Weight of  risk-free Treasury bills*Expected return on risk-free  Treasury bills
Best estimate of the portfolio expected rate of return = 65%*10.70 + 35%*3
Best estimate of the portfolio expected rate of return = 0.08005
Best estimate of the portfolio expected rate of return = 8.01%