What is the value of a? Round to the nearest tenth Need help fast!!

A student group has $6,000 budgeted for a field trip. The cost of transportation for the trip is $2,800. To stay within the budg

docker41 [41]

Answer:c=3200

Step-by-step explanation:

2800+c<=6000

2800-2800+c<=6000-2800

c=3200

8 0

3 years ago

HELP ME PLLEEEEASE I BEG

agasfer [191]

Union = {0,1,4,8,10,16}

Intersection = {4,16}

5 0

3 years ago

If you multiply the sum of 546 and 1711 by zero, what will be your result?

Tomtit [17]

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

any numbers multiply by zero always equals to zero

5 0

3 years ago

Divide. 26−6 Enter your answer as a mixed number, in simplified form, in the box.

Harman [31]

4 2/6 that is the answer you were looking for i hope

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Location is known to affect the number, of a particular item, sold by an automobile dealer. Two different locations, A and B, ar

yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

We conclude that the true mean number of sales at location A is fewer than the true mean number of sales at location B.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Location A was observed for 18 days and location B was observed for 13 days.

On average, location A sold 39 of these items with a sample standard deviation of 8 and location B sold 49 of these items with a sample standard deviation of 4.

Let $\mu_1$ = true mean number of sales at location A.

$\mu_2$ = true mean number of sales at location B

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu_1-\mu_2\geq0$ or $\mu_1 \geq \mu_2$ {means that the true mean number of sales at location A is greater than or equal to the true mean number of sales at location B}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu_1-\mu_2$ or $\mu_1< \mu_2$ {means that the true mean number of sales at location A is fewer than the true mean number of sales at location B}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviations;

T.S. = $\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ~ $t_n__1_-_n__2-2$

where, $\bar X_1$ = sample average of items sold at location A = 39

$\bar X_2$ = sample average of items sold at location B = 49

$s_1$ = sample standard deviation of items sold at location A = 8

$s_2$ = sample standard deviation of items sold at location B = 4

$n_1$ = sample of days location A was observed = 18

$n_2$ = sample of days location B was observed = 13

Also, $s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }$ = $\sqrt{\frac{(18-1)\times 8^{2}+(13-1)\times 4^{2} }{18+13-2} }$ = 6.64

So, test statistics = $\frac{(39-49)-(0)}{6.64 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{18}+\frac{1}{13} } }$ ~ $t_2_9$

= -4.14

The value of t test statistics is -4.14.

Now, at 0.01 significance level the t table gives critical value of -2.462 at 29 degree of freedom for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistics is less than the critical values of t as -2.462 > -4.14, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the true mean number of sales at location A is fewer than the true mean number of sales at location B.

3 0

3 years ago