1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GrogVix [38]
3 years ago
11

The law of demand explains that:

History
1 answer:
Mars2501 [29]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A. Demand for a product goes up as the price goes down

Explanation:

Definition: The law of demand is one of the most fundamental concepts in economics. ... The law of demand states that quantity purchased varies inversely with price. In other words, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded.

You might be interested in
History is more than a series of events. it is a _____ of events
NISA [10]
it's a life of serious
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think Andrew Jackson was so popular in the 1820s and 1830s? Do you think he would be as popular a leader if he were p
Harman [31]

Answer:  Read Bellow

Explanation: Since Andrew Jackson was so popular for serving in the War of 1812 and winning in the Battle Of New Orleans, many people saw Jackson as a hero, so he got elected president. I don't think that he would be that popular today because we have different technology such as tanks and airplanes to battle, not like horses or cannons they had back then.

6 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
Where is rhode island
Nezavi [6.7K]

Rhode Island is bounded to the north and east by Massachusetts, to the south by Rhode Island Sound and Block Island Sound of the Atlantic Ocean, and to the west by Connecticut.

5 0
3 years ago
Which is true about adaptations?
coldgirl [10]
the answer so C- they are passed along to offspring.

an adaptation is a genetic change overtime that makes an organism better suited to their environment. organisms with some adaptions pass on their genes more than organisms without it, making them appear more often in a population.

A is not true because they are not learned, they are naturally acquired through mutations or genetic recombinations.

B is not true because genetics cannot really be changed that much during lifetime unless there is a mutation. still, a change acquired during an organisms lifetime would not be passed down to the offspring.

D is not true because a part of an organisms genetic makeup would not disappear all of the sudden.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Domesticated animals provided what 3 things for pastoral people
    15·1 answer
  • What is Khrushchev’s stance toward war ?
    9·1 answer
  • Why are stories told about Cortes and the Aztec (Mexica) so problematic?
    10·1 answer
  • A major u.s. trade partner has just gone to war with its neighbor. its leader asks the united states for help. which of the foll
    8·1 answer
  • Please Ibeg beg beg beg you please help m e
    12·1 answer
  • What are the stated purposes of Juché and Songun?
    15·1 answer
  • HELP PLZ 10 pts!!!
    11·1 answer
  • What effect did Federalist No. 51 have on the final U.S. Constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • Was feelin' that, feelin' that breeze
    14·1 answer
  • Why was Sherman's "total war" a major change from earlier forms of<br> fighting?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!