What Octavia should do is send a quick reply explaining that she needs more time to consider the question. Say the customer is asking asking something really complicated, the receiver will might need more time to answer than an easier question.
Answer:
Material Quantity Variance= $ 3240 Unfavorable
Explanation:
Given
Standard Quantity Direct materials 5.8 ounces
Standard Price$ 3.00 per ounce * 5.8= $ 17.40
Actual output 3,400 units
Raw materials used in production 20,800 ounces
Purchases of raw materials 21,900
Working
Standard Material required for 3,400 units
*5.8= 19720 ounces.
Standard Price for 19720 ounces* 3= $ 59160
Material Quantity Variance= (Standard Price * Actual Quantity)-(Standard Price * Standard Quantity)
Material Quantity Variance= 3*20,800 - (3* 19720)
Material Quantity Variance= $62400- $ 59160= $ 3240 Unfavorable
It is unfavorable because the actual quantity used is more than the standard usage.
•Make sure she is financially able to cope if losses are made. Investing in stock markets are risky and the money she put in could be lost so she must make sure she has other savings so she doesn't go in debt/bankrupt.
•Research in order to make an informed choice. She could research types of assets, expert advice, and how the investment would be split.
Answer:
Using slover in excel, the optimum cost will be $230,000
Explanation:
et ‘a’ be the number of fronts made.
Let ‘b’ be the number of seats made.
Let ‘c’ be the number of wheels made.
Let ‘x’ be the number of fronts purchased.
Let ‘y’ be the number of seats purchased.
Let ‘z’ be the number of wheels purchased.
Minimum cost (z) = 8a + 6b +1c + 12x + 9y + 3z
3a + 4b + 0.5c <= 50000
10a + 6b + 2c <= 160000
2a + 2b + 0.1 <= 30000
a + c >= 120000
b +y >= 120,000
c + z > =24000
a, b, c, x, y, z >= 0
Answer:
Answer for the question:
A company producing custom-made teddy bears is considering several options for expanding their existing capacity. There are 3 possibilities. The first is a low-end machine, which would take 10 minutes/bear for the (machined) manufacturing process. In addition, an average of 30 minutes of detail work would have to be done by hand (per bear). The second option is a high-end machine, which would take 8 minutes/bear, and reduce the amount of hand detail work to 25 minutes/bear. The final option is to subcontract out the bears. The subcontractor is willing to provide up to 400 bears per year for a flat fee of $2,000. Additional bears would cost $8 each. There is no difference in bear quality between the 3 options. It costs $10,000 to buy the low-end machine. Yearly maintenance is $1,000. The purchase price for the high-end machine is $15,000, while maintenance is $2,200. Management estimates the cost for running a machine at $6/hour. Labor costs are $15/hour. Assume the factory runs 350 days/year for 8 hours/day.a) If you expect a yearly demand of 12,000 bears, which option is the cheapest over a 3-year time horizon?b) If the service times on both machines are Exponentially distributed, and the job arrivals have a Poisson distribution with a rate as specified in part a), what is the expected time between the job's arrivals at the factory to the time it is complete and can leave? (Assume that there are more than enough workers to cover the hand detail workc) At what arrival rates (demand levels) would the different options make sense, given a 3-year time horizon?Please write down the answer step by step
is given in the attachment.
Explanation: