Answer:
The correct answer is that: informants are difficult to control and the police can not trust in them always.
Explanation:
To begin with, if the police officer finds out that the informant went behind his back and purchase drug then the officer must understand that the informant is not trustful and moreover<u> he could mean a risk to the whole undercover operation</u> that the police officer is managing, therefore that the scenario is propounding that situations like that exemplify that informants can not be trusted due to the fact that they are ex convicted and that is why the officers have to be carefull when working with them.
Answer:
<u>Demographic</u>
Explanation:
Harry's caters to the clothing needs of men, manufacturing two different lines of fashion based on the purchasing power of its customer . One product line caters to the needs pf affluent , middle-aged men , and the other line targets younger , up -and - coming professionals . Harry's most likely segments the consumer market is based on<em><u> demographic variables.</u></em>
<em>The statistical data of the population of the people is known as demographics . Demographics contain age , gender , income etc.</em>
Demographic is important for the company as it help the company to tell about how to market and how to develop the brand. It helps in telling the behavior of the customer towards the product means whether the people liking the product or not liking the product . It is consider as the best way to reach to the people and know about their preference for the product.
Answer:
Depreciation expense= $7,612.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchase price= $66,000
Salvage value= $5,100
Useful life= 8 years
<u>First, we need to determine the depreciation expense for the whole year. We will use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Annual depreciation= 2*[(book value)/estimated life (years)]
Annual depreciation= 2*[(66,000 - 5,100) / 8]
Annual depreciation= $15,225
<u>For 2020:</u>
Depreciation expense= (15,225/12)*6= $7,612.5
Answer:
<u>True</u>
Explanation:
Remember, Consideration is that thing that is legally agreed and given such as money, property in exchange for something.
What usually should come first in any contract is sufficient consideration; presence of value to be given.
Therefore, a Court can refuse to enforce an agreement due to insufficient consideration because it is the primary thing that should come first in any contract.
For example, a father gives his adult son $5 on Monday as a present and the son is impressed he says he’ll give his father $10 the following day, there is no contract. In this scenario the son does not have to give his father $10 on Tuesday, because they (son and father) did not agree to give $5 in exchange for $10. A court would term this case as having insufficient consideration.
Answer:
$1,511,642.50
Explanation:
Kindly check attached picture for detailed explanation
