3/2
<em>Step One:</em> 1 3/8, transform the number into a improper fraction:
- To have a mixed number in to a improper fraction, you need to use addition and multiplication. For 1 3/8, We first multiply the denominator (8, also know to be the bottom number of the fraction) to the whole number (1). 8x1= 8
- NOTE: The original denominator (8) will be use for are improper, again playing as the denominator, we only multiply the denominator for the numerator (which is the top number of a fraction).
- After multiplying, we'll add are product with the numerator (3) for the process. 8+3= 12
- Now we have both numerator and denominator for 1 3/8, we can create the improper fraction. 12 as the numerator and 8 as the denominator. 12/8
- We still need to simplify the number. To that, we need the biggest whole number, or rather I call it the lowest number, that can be divide both in 12 and 8.
- 4 can be divide by both number so: 12/4= 3 and 8/4=2
- Now 3 is are simplify numerator and 2 is are simplify denominator.
Answer:
Try B Or C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
- Angle 'a' is an alternating exterior angle with one angle in the triangle and therefore congruent to one angle in the triangle formed by lines m, x, and y.
- Angles 'b' and 'c' are vertical angles with the other two angles in the triangle and therefore congruent to two other angles in the triangle
Step-by-step explanation:
Vertical angles are angles that are equal to each other but in opposite direction. The angles b and c have vertical angles on the triangle Q while alternate exterior angles are equal angles that lie on different lanes cutting through an axis.
Angles on a plane can be congruent if they are vertical equals or alternating exterior angles.
so, the percentage of the rate is 0.185, what's that as a percentage? well, 0.185 * 100, 18.5%.
In this item, it can be seen that from an expression of,
(4 + 5i) + (-3 + 7i)
Aiko transformed the equation by factoring out the i's from the expression and wrote it as,
(4 + 5)i + (-3 + 7)i
Now this is wrong because i there is not a variable but a notation that 5 and 7 are imaginary numbers. In fact, she cannot factor out the i's because it is not present in both -3 and 4. The answer therefore to this item is the last sentence, "Aiko incorrectly used the distributive property by combining ..."
