Answer:
30+(2x+7)+63=180(sum of angles of triangle )
30+2x+7+63=180
2x+100=180
2x=180-100
x=80/2
x=40
Answer: Phillip is correct. The triangles are <u>not </u>congruent.
How do we know this? Because triangle ABC has the 15 inch side between the two angles 50 and 60 degrees. The other triangle must have the same set up (just with different letters XYZ). This isn't the case. The 15 inch side for triangle XYZ is between the 50 and 70 degree angle.
This mismatch means we cannot use the "S" in the ASA or AAS simply because we don't have a proper corresponding pair of sides. If we knew AB, BC, XZ or YZ, then we might be able to use ASA or AAS.
At this point, there isn't enough information. So that means John and Mary are incorrect, leaving Phillip to be correct by default.
Note: Phillip may be wrong and the triangles could be congruent, but again, we don't have enough info. If there was an answer choice simply saying "there isn't enough info to say either if the triangles are congruent or not", then this would be the best answer. Unfortunately, it looks like this answer is missing. So what I bolded above is the next best thing.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The secant- tangent angle MLK is half the difference of the intercepted arcs, that is
(KN - KM) = 70° ( multiply both sides by 2 to clear the fraction )
KN - KM = 140°
KN - 61° = 140° ( add 61° to both sides )
KN = 201° → C
Let distance between warehouse and retail outlets be x miles.
We are told that for a one-way trip, the trucking company charges a flat rate of $250 per truck, plus $1.25 for every mile driven. The apparel company has a budget of less than $950 per trip.
Upon multiplying 1.25 by x we will get delivering charges for x miles as 1.25*x. Total delivery charges also include $250 per one-way trip, therefore, 250 will be our constant.
Our total delivery charges for x miles will be,
The apparel company should service those outlets for whom delivery cost will be less than $950.
Therefore, an inequality representing apparel company's profit will be .
