B ? i believe. Suffixes<span> are endings that are added to root words. If the ending begins with a </span>vowel<span>, the spelling of the root word usually changes.</span>
When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks.
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
The answer for the given question above would be the first option. The excerpt from Beowulf “The Battle With the Dragon” that *most *plainly casts the dragon as the tale’s antagonist is this: <span> “Vomiting fire and smoke, the dragon/Burned down their homes.” Hope this helps.</span>
The Kite Runner focuses nearly exclusively on male relationships. While the relationship between father and son is important to the novel, male friendship is central as well. Amir's relationship with Hassan is the most obvious example.
