Answer:
If you invented a time machine—where would you go? Any place, time, etc.
Explanation: My reason for asking this is that in the comments, we’re going to work out this essay business. Please let me know in the comments how many paragraphs you have to have.
Voice, because to dictate it to speak. We can find the base word of dictate in diction. Diction is the use of words in speech and the enunciation of those word while speaking. We know it must be voice because the sentence says the doctor uses a voice recorder in stead of physically writing notes.
Answer:
the movie is called the giver
Explanation:
He begins to question why the community has gotten rid of certain things that bring such joy and sense of completeness (like grandparents, family, and love). His conversation with The Giver also shows that he is beginning to doubt the rationale argument for why the community made these choices
The answer is “get”
If you sell your shoes you get much money from them. Not would not make sense in this sentence.
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
