Answer:
Correct answer is Baron de Montesquieu.
Explanation:
In general Locke and Montesquieu were writing the most about the separation of power and they are the ones that should be taken into consideration.
Montesquieu is the correct answer as he discussed about balances, and he was the one that believed that power should be equally divided.
Rousseau and Hobbes were discussing about this topic that much.
Jewish political movements refer to the organized efforts of Jews to build their own political parties or otherwise represent their interest in politics outside the Jewish community. From the time of the siege of Jerusalem by the Romans to the foundation of Israel the Jewish people had no territory, and, until the 19th century they by-and-large were also denied equal rights in the countries in which they lived. Thus, until the 19th century effort for the emancipation of the Jews, almost all Jewish political struggles were internal, and dealt primarily with either religious issues or issues of a particular Jewish community.
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
According to me, if we use Military history to learn about leadership and study the commander's mind then it will be the more constructive approach towards the subject. We can keep our focus on military affairs which have large impact on our society.
Military history as a discipline record the armed conflict in the history of humanity and tries to assess it's impact over economies, societies, culture, etc. which in result lead to changes or development in local and international affairs. It also help us to study about military strategy adopted by each side and help in assessing how these tactics and technologies have changed with time, for example, it tries to explain that how warfare led to the development of weapon and with time how emerging technologies have shaped these weapons.
Answer:
With the failure of the so-called "Spring Offensive" on the western front.
Explanation:
Also called Kaiserschlacht (translated as "Battle of the Emperors" or "The Battle of the Kaiser", and referred to by the British as "The Great March Retreat"
it would be the last great offensive of the German army during the First World War in honor of the Kaiser William II. It lasted from March 21 to April 5, 1918, being the largest isolated attack of the entire war.
The main objective was to conquer the city of Amiens but after hard and long fighting, General Ludendorff gave up the battle and with it the necessary progress to stop the Allied troops.
Despite this setback, the Germans were very close to achieving their goal of giving the Allies a hard setback. The land gains were higher than all those made by British and French on the western front since the beginning of the war, reaching some points to deepen almost 60 km. The allies suffered about 250,000 casualties, including 90,000 captured British soldiers. For their part, the Germans also suffered a high number of casualties, 240,000.
It is possible that if Amiens had succeeded, the result of the offensive would have been completely different, but the truth is that Ludendorff had not realized the importance of this strategic point. Now the Germans, despite still having the initiative, were in a very vulnerable position.
Answer:
dog
Explanation:
because it's the who or what in the sentence
