All categories

2 years ago

Solve the inequality. a−2>4

Mathematics

2 answers:

Sunny_sXe [5.5K]2 years ago

5 0

The answer is A>6 i just copied the guy

Ghella [55]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

a>6

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Solve the Equation <br> 2x-3=14<br> -x+3y=-6

andriy [413]

Step-by-step explanation:

If you lost "y" in the first equation.

$\underline{+\left\{\begin{array}{ccc}2x-3y=14\\-x+3y=-6\end{array}\right}\qquad\text{add both sides of the equations}\\\\.\qquad x=8\\\\\text{Put the value of x to the first equation:}\\\\2(8)-3y=14\\16-3y=14\qquad\text{subtract 16 from both sides}\\-3y=-2\qquad\text{divide both sides by (-3)}\\y=\dfrac{2}{3}\\\boxed{x=8,\ y=\dfrac{2}{3}}$

If first equation is correct.

$2x-3=14\qquad\text{add 3 to both sides}\\2x=17\qquad\text{divide both sides by 2}\\x=8.5\\\\\text{Put the value of x to the second equation:}\\-8.5+3y=-6\qquad\text{add 8.5 to both sides}\\3y=2.5\qquad\text{divide both sides by 3}\\y=\dfrac{2.5}{3}\\y=\dfrac{25}{30}\\y=\dfrac{5}{6}\\\\\boxed{x=8.5,\ y=\dfrac{5}{6}}$

6 0

2 years ago

R + s² at r = 4, s = 1 ( Pls show work) AND NO LINKS THX UwU

icang [17]

r+s^2

4+1^2

4+2

Hopefully this helped

Cani get the brainliest please

5 0

2 years ago

Determine which of (a)-(d) form a solution to the given system for any choice of the free parameter. (HINT: All parameters of a

Alecsey [184]

Answer:

Please see attachment

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What special word is used to describe a polygon which has equal sides?

Verdich [7]

Hey there! I'm happy to help!

In geometry, a polygon with all equal sides is called an equilateral polygon. You can see the words equal and lateral in that word. Lateral has to do with sides, so the word equilateral literally means "equal sides". How cool!

Have a wonderful day! :D

6 0

3 years ago

Is f(x) =3*(7/4)^x a growth or decay. Please help me it’s urgent!!!!

kupik [55]

Answer:

growth

Step-by-step explanation:

the value under ^x is more than 1

7/4 >1

So, we have exponential growth

3 0

2 years ago