It's impossible to choose a correct option as you've not attached any of it. Anyway I think that you mean the term which is called <span>APPROVED BUDGET.</span>
Answer:
The answer is<u> "$500".</u>
Explanation:
The amount of monetary damages Mary can likely recover from the manufacturer of the toaster is $500, because the disclaimer label on the toaster clearly states that, the manufacturer company is not liable for consequential damages. The damage of the electrical wiring in the kitchen refers to consequential damage because it is not the direct result of the damage of toaster but it is due to the spark in the toaster.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of cost of ending work in process inventory for materials, conversion, and in total is shown below:-
For material = 2,080 × $15.66
= $32,572.80
For conversion = 930 × $6.23
= $5,793.90
For total cost of work in process inventory = $32,572.80 + $5,793.90
= $38,366.70
b. The computation of cost of the units completed and transferred out for materials, conversion, and in total is shown below:-
For material = 21,700 × $15.66
= $339,822
For Conversion = 21,700 × $6.23
= $135,191
For total cost of completed and transferred units = $339,822 + $135,191
= $475,013
The portion of the second monthly payment made on January 31, 2021, which represents repayment of principal is $15600.
<h3>
Mortgage liability </h3>
Mortgage liability limits the liability of potential third parties who were not involved when the mortgage was arranged. For example, if a mortgage is in arrears, the debtor has to pay the outstanding principal and interest, plus late payment and other charges.
<h3>
What is mortgage asset or liabilities?</h3>
A current liability for
1) the principal payments that will be coming due within one year after the balance sheet date, and
2) any accrued interest that is owed as of the balance sheet date.
To learn more about current liability visit the link
brainly.com/question/14287268
#SPJ4
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
