Answer:
A. The economy switches to producing less of one product without increasing the production of the other product
Step-by-step explanation:
PPC is the graphical representation of product combinations that an economy can produce, given resources & technology. It is downward sloping because given resources & technology, production of a good can be increased by decreasing production of other good.
It is based on assumption that resources are efficiently utilised. Points on PPC show resources efficient utilisation, Points under PPC show under utilisation, Points outside PPC are beyond country's productive capacity.
If country produces less of a good without increasing production of other goods, implying wasted resources & production below PPC. This case doesn't satisfy productive efficiency
Other cases : Producing more of a good & less of other is just re allocative movement on the PPC itself. Production point at PPF intersection with either axis implies economy is producing only the good on that axis.
In all the cases except A. satisfy the 'productive efficiency'
Answer:
2.32 gallons of paint
Step-by-step explanation:
First, find the area of all 4 sides of the room, with the equation A = lw
11(10)
= 110 (for 2 of the walls)
18(10)
= 180 (for the other 2 walls)
Add these up:
110 + 110 + 180 + 180
= 580
Then, divide this by 250:
580/250
= 2.32
So, 2.32 gallons of paint will be needed to paint the room.
Step-by-step explanation:
c=5/9(f-32) can also be written as c = 5(f - 32)/9.
Multiply each side by 9.
That gives us 9c = 5(f - 32).
Apply distributive rule on the right side.
9c = 5f - 160
Add 160 to the left side.
9c + 160 = 5f
Lastly, divide both sides 5.
(9c + 160)/5 = f
Answer:
The value of
is -16.
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to evaluate
for x = -1, y = 5 and let us assume that z = 1
It can be simply done by putting the values of x,y and z in the given expression.

We know that the value of 4² = 16
So,

So, the value of
is -16.
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.