The decision in Marbury v. Madison said that the judicial department must <u>a. enforce</u> the law.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Marbury v. Madison was a critical case handled by Supreme Court of America. This case helps in bringing some special powers to judicial department in the United States of America.
According to this review, the courts in America gained the power to knock down the laws, order, and even some actions taken by government which causes violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
The judicial department of America have acquired to power to change the law and order of the constitution. The decision in Marbury v. Madison was taken by chief justice: <u>John Marshall.
</u>
He was a key figure in uniting Canada.
<span>They supported the policies of his party (he was a conservative) </span>
<span>He was considered to be a good leader (or at least better than those who ran against him) ..</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is b. the constituents likely do not actually have well-formed views on the issues that are decided in Congress.
Explanation:
One major problem with the role of the instructed delegate is that constituents may not actually have well-formed views on many issues.
People conform to peer pressure because as imperfect humans we don't always make the right decisions so people conform to peer pressure because they may feel left out or accused of not doing what others are doing. Impact? well peer pressure is common and devastating so its like a burned scar emotionally. Me? No due to my age I haven't been in that type of situation but soon I will and I hope I don't give in to pressure.
Explanation:According to Hamilton's plan, the House of Representatives represents the general population, while the senate has an equal number of senators from every state
