1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Usimov [2.4K]
2 years ago
9

Noa was paid a 25 percent commission for selling a used car.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Fantom [35]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the answer is 6,524.96

Step-by-step explanation:

nevsk [136]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders o
melomori [17]

Answer:

A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B. Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

C. z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558  

D. z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96  z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96

E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=362 represent the random sample taken

X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate

\hat p=\frac{33}{363}=0.0912 estimated proportion of orders not accurate

p_o=0.10 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses

Null hypothesis:p=0.1  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.1  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

C: Find the test statistic

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558  

D: Find the critical value(s)

Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:

z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96  z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96

P value

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z  

E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.

Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F: Write the conclusion of the test.

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.  

6 0
3 years ago
Helppppppppppppppppppppppppp
balandron [24]

Answer:

b.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which shows the following numbers ordered from greatest to least?
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

D You got it right. 65% 5/8 3/5 0.5

4 0
2 years ago
1. Gavin and Seiji both worked hard over the summer. Together, they earned a total of $425. Gavin earned $25 more than Seiji. Ho
Gre4nikov [31]
Let x = the amount that Seini earned
Then x + 25 = the amount that Gavin
The amount Gavin earned would also = 425 - x (your directions asked you to have 2 equations.)
Together they earned 425:
x + (x + 25) = 425
2x + 25 = 425
2x = 400
Now divide both sides by 2 to find x.

Use all of this data to satisfy the directions.
8 0
3 years ago
Plsss help no one answered the other times I put this question
svetlana [45]

Answer:

a) <em>The equation</em> (10s + 8w) <em>represents </em><em>the </em><em>calories </em><em>Bridget </em><em>ate </em><em>on </em><em>Monday </em><em>and </em><em>the </em><em>equation</em> (20s + w) <em>represents </em><em>the </em><em>calories</em><em> </em><em>she </em><em>ate</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>next </em><em>day.</em>

<em>b)</em><em> </em><em>The </em><em>number </em><em>of </em><em>calories</em><em> </em><em>in </em><em>each </em><em>strawberry</em><em> </em><em>is </em>4 <em>and </em><em>the </em><em>number </em><em>of </em><em>calories </em><em>in </em><em>each </em><em>vanilla</em><em> </em><em>wafer</em><em> cookie</em><em> </em><em>is </em>19. The solution is s= 4 and w = 19.

Step-by-step explanation:

For part A, Bridget ate 10 strawberries and 8 vanilla wafer cookies on Monday. Since the the number of calories in a strawberry is <em>s</em> and the number of calories in a vanilla wafer cookie is <em>w </em>, the number of calories Bridget ate on Monday is <em>10s + 8w</em><em>.</em><em> </em>The next day, Bridget ate 20 strawberries and 1 vanilla wafer cookie. Hence, the number of calories Bridget ate on the next day is 20s<em> + w</em>.

For part B,

we will create two different simultaneous equations.

Equation 1: 10s + 8w = 192

Equation 2: 20s + w = 99

We need to find one of the terms first to solve the other term. For this case, I will solve for w first.

Multiply the first equation by 2.

Equation 3: 20s + 16w = 192*2 = 384.

Now, subtract equation 2 from this new equation.

Equation 4:

(20s + 16w) - (20s + w) = 384 - 99

20s + 16w - 20s - w = 285

15w = 285

This leaves only w left and we can solve w.

w = 285 / 15 = 19

Now, we can solve for s using equation 2.

20s + 19 = 99

20s = 99-19 = 80

Hence,

s = 80/20 = 4

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Solve for x: 4 = (–8) +3x show your work
    7·1 answer
  • Carol needs for lb of nuts for her granola she has 26 oz of walnuts and 28 oz of cashews how many ounces of peanuts should she b
    10·1 answer
  • What is the percent of increase for a population that changed from 25,000 to 30,000?
    11·2 answers
  • A box contains 19 large marbles and 18 small marbles. Each marble is either green or white. 9 of the large marbles are green, an
    7·1 answer
  • The net of a three-dimensional figure is made using 1 rectangle and a number of triangles. What is the three-dimensional figure?
    7·2 answers
  • Whats the quotient of 1 1/4 and 31/2
    9·1 answer
  • Find f(-3) PLEASE HELP
    7·2 answers
  • The duration of routine operations at chicago general hospital has approximately a normal distribution with an average of 130 mi
    15·1 answer
  • A piece of rope is 55 feet 6 inches long and a piece 6 feet 9 inches is cut from it.
    6·1 answer
  • The graph of a sine function g(x) is presented below.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!