Answer:
Don't ask so many questions at the same time ok
Answer:
c. is illustrated when a government program is justified not on its merits but on the number of jobs it will create.
Explanation:
Answer:
securities
bond
stock
Explanation:
Corporations source their finances from issuing securities. If they borrow from banks or other corporations or from investors, then that is considered debt. They can also borrow debt by issuing bonds which are fixed securities which can either be paying coupons periodically or not. If they do not have debt financing, they can sell part of company ownership to investors by issuing stocks and pay dividends to them in return.
Answer:
Suppose there is an individual who needs a certain level of income, I°, in order to stay alive. An increase in income above that level of income I° will have a diminishing marginal utility. Below I°, the individual will be a risk lover and will take unfair gambles and risks in an effort to make large gains in income. Above I°, the individual will purchase insurance against losses.
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
The action, looking through the paradigm of Utilitarianism would be considered ethical.
Any action especially by the ruling powers, government or political class which regardless of the rule of law is aimed at engineering the social, economic and or political levers of any state to the end that it betters society as a whole would be considered Utilitarian.
Utilitarianism is simply a theory or philosophy which preaches and teaches the need for happiness or pleasure whilst condemning any action, policy, thought or law that stimulates harm and unhappiness.
According to the question, the Privacy Act of 1974 had debarred the acquisition of Intelligence especially for the purpose of transacting business. Sooner or later it purchased, through an entity, information about its citizens on the basis of the need for National Security.
The act of seeking the welfare of the state thus becomes permissible reason under an utilitarian government for it to break a protocol or an existing edict.
Cheers!
Cheers!