Answer:
No, It is not true
Step-by-step explanation:
First of all, we should have a number in the tenths place, and we don't.
Also, in the hundredths place, we should have 9, not 4.
And finally, the answers should be 0.195, not 0.042.
The Problem which talks about correlation about Researchers studying senior citizens discovered that an elderly person's walking speed was correlated to that person's chance of living longer.
Also, it is given that The fastest walkers were more likely to live another 10 years than were the slowest walkers.
So, we can conclude from above statement that , elders who walks more has high correlation than the elders who do not take regular walk daily.
Yes, as walking makes our heart , body and mind strong, so chances of living becomes higher.
So, Elders who take walk regularly has high value of Positive correlation than person who does not take regular walk.
<span>1. First, label the axis on your graph, with units:
time on the x-axis, in units of hours;
distance on the y-axis, in units of miles.
2. Draw a graph of distance vs. time. Distance after the first hour = 69 miles, distance after the 2nd hour = 138 miles, etc.
3. Observe that this graph is a STRAIGHT LINE with constant slope. Therefore the relationship is PROPORTIONAL.
For every other kind of graph -- i.e. not a straight line -- the relationship is NON-PROPORTIONAL.
Hope this helps. </span>
Answer:
X = 28
Step-by-step explanation:
The angle is 90 degrees in total and one portion of the angle is 62 degrees
You subtract the 62 degrees from the 90-degree angle to figure out the other unknown portion of the angle
90 - 62 = 28
