<span>Charles Beard believed that the constitution was written by a group of rich people with economic interests. Beard believed that the reasons were financial interest and called the constitution a counterrevolution of the holders of bonds against ordinary people, farmers, and debtors. I argue that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were not the true motivation of the editors and were trying to protect their wealth. The authors were rich and powerful men who did things like allow slavery to continue and the contradiction of their speeches.</span>
The Supreme Court had been striking down New Deal Programs as unconstitutional. Before Roosevelt introduced this plan, the Supreme Court have rejected many elements of his New Deal plan because the authority held by the Executive was too much and considered unconstitutional. He thought that by adding more justices to the Supreme Court, it would protect his legislation. Still it was rejected by both liberals and conservatives.
The answer is
Federalists and antifederalists were divided between two groups in the Constitution. In both groups there are philosophies. There are many discussions in the Constitution about the fate of America and its structure. The anti-federalists are concerned about the National Government's role and dominance over the people.
I hope this helps anyone
