Answer:
A. An intermittent reinforcement schedule
Explanation:
Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is the availability heuristic.
Explanation:
The availability heuristic is a mental short-cut that takes place when a person relies on immediately available, often recent information to justifiy their ideas or take decisions. In the example, when George notices his new professor was young, he was surprised because the only available information he had about psychology teachers was completely different.
This heuristic may result in poor decision-making and even <u>stereotyping</u>.
