Answer:
Part a: C
Part b: 2x34
d=68
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
4/9 of 18 is 8
Answer:
7
Step-by-step explanation:
1/2<u>(48/6)</u> - 2 + 5
<u>1/2(8)</u> - 2 + 5
<u>4 - 2</u> + 5
<u>2 + 5</u>
7