Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
Fiduciary assignments that have as their object the realization of investments, the administration of goods or the execution of activities related to the granting of guarantees by third parties to ensure the fulfillment of obligations, the administration or surveillance of the goods on which the guarantees fall and the carrying them out, subject to the restrictions established by law; act as transfer agent and register of securities; act as a representative of bondholders; act as trustee, curator of property or as depositary of sums recorded in any court, by order of judicial authority or by determination of persons who have legal power to designate them for such purpose.
Fiduciary companies may carry out investment trust operations through commercial fiduciary contracts, concluded in accordance with legal formalities, or through fiduciary orders.
Fiduciary activities are not reported in the government-wide financial statements
They may form ordinary common investment funds integrated with monies received from various constituents or adherents for this purpose.
Traditionally, the formulas used to express a firm's cost of equity are the dividend capitalization model and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM).
Explanation:
Generally, two risk components determine a firm's cost of equity. The first is the systematic risk associated with the broader equity market. All firms are exposed to this risk, and it cannot be mitigated through diversification.
The second risk component is the unsystematic risk associated with the firm in question. This risk, often reflected as beta, a measure of the stock's volatility in relation to the volatility of the broader market, can be mitigated via diversification.
Answer:
multiple product order
Explanation:
A multiple product order is not a court order, but rather an order coming from the Federal Trade Commission ordering a firm that has used false or deceptive advertisement to stop doing it. This prohibition includes all the products manufactured or sold by the company that used the false advertisement.
In this case, CSI has to stop all types of advertisement regarding the products that it manufactures.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Gross Domestic Product is the total market value of all final goods and services produced within a country during a given period of time. It is usually a year.
In calculating, GDP, we have expenditure approach, income approach and value-added approach.
In this question, the expenditure approach will be used to explain the answer to this question.
To calculate GDP using expenditure approach, the formula is:
C + I + G + (X-M)
where C is the consumers' spending
I is the investment spending
G is government spending
X is the exports
M is the imports.
The correct answer is C. firms purchases of inventories is part of investment spending. Firms can purchase raw materials(inventory) and process it into finished goods(inventory). The change in inventory(difference between the closing inventory and opening inventory) is part of the calculation of investment spending.
Households buying inventories(finished goods) is part of consumers' spending and not investment spending.