1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
chubhunter [2.5K]
3 years ago
11

Explain why any of the four operations placed between two terms 5 and -3 sqrt (8) will result in an irrational number

Mathematics
1 answer:
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
7 0

Sum/difference:

Let

x = 5 + (-3\sqrt{8}) = 5-3\sqrt{8}

This means that

3\sqrt{8} = 5-x \iff \sqrt{8} = \dfrac{5-x}{3}

Now, assume that x is rational. The sum/difference of two rational numbers is still rational (so 5-x is rational), and the division by 3 doesn't change this. So, you have that the square root of 8 equals a rational number, which is false. The mistake must have been supposing that x was rational, which proves that the sum/difference of the two given terms was irrational

Multiplication/division:

The logic is actually the same: if we multiply the two terms we get

x = -15\sqrt{8}

if again we assume x to be rational, we have

\sqrt{8} = -\dfrac{x}{15}

But if x is rational, so is -x/15, and again we come to a contradiction: we have the square root of 8 on one side, which is irrational, and -x/15 on the other, which is rational. So, again, x must have been irrational. You can prove the same claim for the division in a totally similar fashion.

You might be interested in
-25&gt; -5(x + 2.5).<br> WHATS X?
OLga [1]

just use m a t h w a y no spaces tho

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which parallelogram will have the smallest area?
Hoochie [10]

The last one

Step-by-step explanation:

the one with b=7 & h=5 because you have to multiply both numbers together , so you multiply and then see the smallest answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Quick Start Company makes 12-volt car batteries. After many years of product testing, the company knows that the average life of
Oduvanchick [21]

Answer:

a) The company should expect to replace 11.51% of its batteries.

b) 35 months.

Step-by-step explanation:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean \mu and standard deviation \sigma, the zscore of a measure X is given by:

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

In this problem, we have that:

\mu = 43.8, \sigma = 6.5

(a) If Quick Start guarantees a full refund on any battery that fails within the 36-month period after purchase, what percentage of its batteries will the company expect to replace?

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 36. Then

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

Z = \frac{36 - 43.8}{6.5}

Z = -1.2

Z = -1.2 has a pvalue of 0.1151.

The company should expect to replace 11.51% of its batteries.

(b) If quick Start does not want to make refunds for more than 10% of its batteries under the full refund guarantee policy, for how long should the company guarantee the batteries (to the nearest month)?

The warranty should be the 10th percentile, which is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.1. So it is X when Z = -1.28.

Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

-1.28 = \frac{X - 43.8}{6.5}

X - 43.8 = -1.28*6.5

X = 35.48

To the nearest month, 35 months.

7 0
3 years ago
Help me with math question please, will give 20 points
Kisachek [45]

in step 2 he made his first mistake

1/2(n-4)-3=3-(2n+3)

1/2n-4/2-3=3-(2n+3)

1/2n-2-3=3-(2n+3)

in the second step he put 5 instead of 2.

5 0
3 years ago
Several years ago, Dirk bought some gold at a price of $710 per ounce. When he went to sell it, the gold was worth 60% more than
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

$1,136 per ounce.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the new value of gold, you have to find what 60% of 710 is. You do this by converting 60% into a decimal and multiplying it by 710. This results in 0.6*710. 60% of 710 is 426. 426 + the original price of 710 is equal to 1,136.

You can also solve this problem in a condensed manner by multiplying 710 by 1.6: the 1.0 stands for the original price (710) so you don't have to add it later. The 0.6 stands for the 60% more. Multiplying 710 by 1.6 gets you 1,136, which is the new value of gold/ounce.

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 10 + Brainiest Please Help!
    12·1 answer
  • Which numbers are greater than 7 x 10^-4
    7·1 answer
  • Mia's gross pay is $2954 Her deductions total $724.15
    8·1 answer
  • Please its for a test
    11·1 answer
  • 30 POINTS!! HELP ME PLS!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Pls give me the answer.
    5·1 answer
  • The circumference of a circle is 13π m. What is the area, in square meters? Express your answer in terms of π π.
    9·2 answers
  • If h(x) = <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B2x%2B7%7D%7Bx%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\frac{2x+7}{x}" alt="\frac{2x+7}
    7·1 answer
  • A line passes through (3, -2) and (6, 2).
    5·1 answer
  • Solve for x. Round your answer to the nearest tenth.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!