1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dangina [55]
2 years ago
14

If you were a juror in a murder case, and the DNA, blood, fingerprints, or other scientific evidence conflicted with what witnes

ses said that they saw or heard….which would you be more likely to believe? Why?
Law
1 answer:
Llana [10]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)

You might be interested in
What is the quadratic formuala. of math and englsih
Alika [10]

Answer:

.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
As a driver, you can help improve visibility by ...
Anarel [89]

Answer:

hi friend!

the answer is b !

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the ___________ doctrine, officers are permitted to search and to seize evidence, without a warrant, on private pro
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.

- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.

- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).  

To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :

brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

   

7 0
1 year ago
Which of the following is NOT a good way to fit into the crowd if you decide to go to a party and not drink?
9966 [12]
(Need options)Pretend like you are drunk
7 0
2 years ago
Write a four-paragraph summary essay analyzing a Supreme Court Ruling that includes a Dissenting Opinion. You may choose to crea
olga_2 [115]

hi there I hope you're doing well

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ​Pure Oil Company enters into a contract with QuikBilt, Inc., to construct an oil pipeline to withstand specific conditions. If
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND THANKS
    14·1 answer
  • Raleigh, a 55-year-old experienced sales representative at BigCo, is terminated and replaced with Connelly at a lower pay rate.
    5·1 answer
  • If a witness offers an out-of-court statement made by
    11·1 answer
  • True or false? Shooting a vicious animal is permitted in self-defense.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes "sleep-driving"?
    11·1 answer
  • "I am Susan. It is 1880, and I was formerly enslaved. I am a free woman now though, and
    5·2 answers
  • What happens what someone reports your post????????
    14·2 answers
  • Is an amount of money paid to the court to ensure that the defendant
    5·2 answers
  • If you have been punished or discriminated against for using your rights, how long do you have to file a complaint with OSHA?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!