1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dangina [55]
3 years ago
14

If you were a juror in a murder case, and the DNA, blood, fingerprints, or other scientific evidence conflicted with what witnes

ses said that they saw or heard….which would you be more likely to believe? Why?
Law
1 answer:
Llana [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)

You might be interested in
Which of the following is one of the major arguments against term limits for state legislators?
Olin [163]
Need more information to answer this particular question.
4 0
3 years ago
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
3 years ago
Can Trump steal the election?
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

maybe maybe not but who knows thank God Biden won

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When is a Medicare Supplement Insurance consumer subject to underwriting and screened for eligibility?
earnstyle [38]

Answer:If you apply for Medigap coverage after your open enrollment period has passed, you may have to go through medical underwriting. The insurer may review your medical history and refuse to sell you a policy, or sell you one at a higher cost, if you do not meet its underwriting requirements.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin. While visiting Six Flags Over Georgia in Atlanta, she was criminally assaulted by Hans, a M
diamong [38]

As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be <u>Georgia</u>.

<h3>Why would the venue be Georgia?</h3>

The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.

Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.

Find out more on original venues at brainly.com/question/342388.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sixteen year old Carrie is baby sitting for her four year old niece Jill. Carrie leaves Jill alone in the living room and goes i
    9·1 answer
  • Why should political parties have intra party elections
    11·1 answer
  • HELPPPP!!!!! :(((
    6·2 answers
  • العمومية والتجريد والإلزام من الصفات المشتركة بين القواعد القانونية
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think A trump should be elected or B biden should be elected?
    9·2 answers
  • Why should I be a moderate in political rights?
    15·1 answer
  • Help me answer thank u I will mark brainliest
    13·2 answers
  • What is honey-bunning?
    12·1 answer
  • As sworn officers of the court, prosecutors are required to base their decisions of whether to prosecute solely on ____________.
    12·1 answer
  • What types of investment (low,med,high) can result in losing money?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!