The model of aggregate demand and aggregate supply a. is a straightforward extension of the model of supply and demand for a par
ticular market, in which substitution of resources between markets is highlighted. b. is different from the model of supply and demand for a particular market, in that we cannot focus on the substitution of resources between markets to explain aggregate relationships. c. is different from the model of supply and demand for a particular market, in that we have to separate real and nominal variables in the aggregate model. d. is a straightforward extension of the model of supply and demand for a particular market, in which the interaction between real and nominal variables is highlighted.
b. is different from the model of supply and demand for a particular market, in that we cannot focus on the substitution of resources between markets to explain aggregate relationships
Explanation:
Here The two models are different. But it shows the similar idea, also the variables that are determined are totally different. The individual markets should be equipped with the given sources while on the other hand the overall economy could be subsituted the resources inside the market
Answer: Not necessarily: The debt ratios are not directly comparable, since each company is in a different industry.
Explanation:
We cannot authoritatively state that even though Boeing has such a high debt rate, that it is a riskier company than either Microsoft or PG&E. This is due to the drawback in ratio analysis of bias if compared across different industries.
Ratio analysis best works when comparing companies in the same industry because their situations will be similar. Comparing across industries can be misleading because different industries operate in different ways. In the Airplane manufacturing business for instance, having a high amount of debt due to having the tangible assets to back it up might be a normal thing.
The debt ratios are therefore not directly comparable because each company is in a different industry.
Consolidated Income for the year under the proprietary theory approach for ABC corporation = $220,000 + (80,000 × 80%) = $220,000 + 64,000
= $284,000
According to the proprietary theory approach, the wholly-owned company will get the same percentage it owns the proportionate of that subsidiary company or companies.
The answer to this question is Objective In business terms, objective refers to a specific result/situation that company wants to achieve within a certain time frame, after considering all their available resources. In this particular case, the research being done is the resource and connecting advertising to actual dealership is the result/situation that they want to achieve.
