Answer:
A. protect people's natural rights
Explanation:
During the Age of Enlightenment, the concept of natural human rights as we know it started to emerge. The thinkers of this age were the first to question the authority of the absolute monarch. The idea that kings have all the rights shifted in favor of the idea people have their own rights, gained by birth.
<u>Natural human rights included rights to life, liberty, and property</u>. By their ideas, <u>the government was the one who should ensure all people have these rights</u>. They are universal, despite the beliefs or the government that holds the law. In case these universal rights are not fulfilled, people have all the right to overthrown the government that has not provided them.
Answer:
b. panic Disorder (without agoraphobia).
Explanation:
Panic disorder: The panic disorder is distinguished as unexpected and recurring panic attacks accompanying one month of either fret about consequences of the attacks or the future attacks as well as the specific changes in behavior because of the attack.
Agoraphobia in the absence of a history related to panic disorder is defined as an anxiety disorder in which the person dealing with the disorder doesn't meet the DSM-5 criteria for panic disorder. Agoraphobia is also referred to as the primary agoraphobia. However, in a few cases, agoraphobia can occur without the presence of panic attacks.
Answer: Functionalist perspective.
Explanation:
Functionalist perspective is the point of view in which society is complex community as a whole.This society system is made for inducing unity as well as stability in people. Psychologist believe that society is made through interconnection.
The complete society structure is formed in which components are dependent on each other so that balance and harmony of the system can be maintained for performing operations.
Various push and pull factors.
Possible push factors:
- Famine
- Violence
- Homelessness
Possible pull factors:
- Job opportunities
- Social opportunities
- Safety
Answer: School Judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics based on the individual. I know this because everybody makes mistakes, and if you base a person off the mistakes they might've made in the past, your biased and unfair. From my background knowledge, I remember a show on TV called divorce court, this man was judged because of mistakes he did when he was fifteen, he didn't even know better, and he might've been battling his own mind, he didn't deserve to be judged based on his past mistakes. In conclusion, judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics of an individual because it's biased.
Explanation:
