Find the value of f(-8).

Find the missing side lengths. Answers are in simplest radical form with the denominator rationalized.

Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

............................

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is 1/6 divided by 2

77julia77 [94]

1/6 divided by 2

Keep, change, flip

1/6 * 1/2 = 1/12

Answer: 1/12

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many centimeters(cm) of rain fell in this region during the course of the year

yuradex [85]

Answer:

January through

March

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose a shoe factory produces both low-grade and high-grade shoes. The factory produces at least twice as many low-grade as hi

umka2103 [35]

Answer:

The factory should produce 166 pairs of high-grade shoes and 364 pairs of low-grade shoes for maximum profit

Step-by-step explanation:

The given parameters for the shoe production are;

The number of low grade shoes the factory produces ≥ 2 × The number of high-grade shoes produced by the factory

The maximum number of shoes the factory can produce = 500 pairs of shoes

The number of high-grade shoes the dealer calls for daily ≥ 100 pairs

The profit made per pair of high-grade shoed = Birr 2.00

The profit made per of low-grade shoes = Birr 1.00

Let 'H', represent the number of high grade shoes the factory produces and let 'L' represent he number of low-grade shoes the factory produces, we have;

L ≥ 2·H...(1)

L + H ≤ 500...(2)

H ≥ 100...(3)

Total profit, P = 2·H + L

From inequalities (1) and (2), we have;

3·H ≤ 500

H ≤ 500/3 ≈ 166

The maximum number of high-grade shoes that can be produced, H ≤ 166

Therefore, for maximum profit, the factory should produce the maximum number of high-grade shoe pairs, H = 166 pairs

The number of pairs of low grade shoes the factory should produce, L = 500 - 166 = 334 pairs

The maximum profit, P = 2 × 166 + 1 × 364 = 696

6 1

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Prove the following DeMorgan's laws: if LaTeX: XX, LaTeX: AA and LaTeX: BB are sets and LaTeX: \{A_i: i\in I\} {Ai:i∈I} is a fam

MariettaO [177]

$X-(A\cup B)=(X-A)\cap(X-B)$

I'll assume the usual definition of set difference, $X-A=\{x\in X,x\not\in A\}$ .

Let $x\in X-(A\cup B)$ . Then $x\in X$ and $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ . If $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ , then $x\not\in A$ and $x\not\in B$ . This means $x\in X,x\not\in A$ and $x\in X,x\not\in B$ , so it follows that $x\in(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ . Hence $X-(A\cup B)\subset(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ .

Now let $x\in(X-A)\cap(X-B)$ . Then $x\in X-A$ and $x\in X-B$ . By definition of set difference, $x\in X,x\not\in A$ and $x\in X,x\not\in B$ . Since $x\not A,x\not\in B$ , we have $x\not\in(A\cup B)$ , and so $x\in X-(A\cup B)$ . Hence $(X-A)\cap(X-B)\subset X-(A\cup B)$ .

The two sets are subsets of one another, so they must be equal.

$X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)=\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$

The proof of this is the same as above, you just have to indicate that membership, of lack thereof, holds for all indices $i\in I$ .

Proof of one direction for example:

Let $x\in X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)$ . Then $x\in X$ and $x\not\in\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i$ , which in turn means $x\not\in A_i$ for all $i\in I$ . This means $x\in X,x\not\in A_{i_1}$ , and $x\in X,x\not\in A_{i_2}$ , and so on, where $\{i_1,i_2,\ldots\}\subset I$ , for all $i\in I$ . This means $x\in X-A_{i_1}$ , and $x\in X-A_{i_2}$ , and so on, so $x\in\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$ . Hence $X-\left(\bigcup\limits_{i\in I}A_i\right)\subset\bigcap\limits_{i\in I}(X-A_i)$ .

4 0

3 years ago