All categories

2 years ago

Use the figure below to answer the questions.

Mathematics

1 answer:

vodomira [7]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Take your pick, or make your own, there's an infinite number of ways.

Step-by-step explanation:

Rotate CCW 90° about (0, 0) (x, y) → (-y, x)

Shift 2 units right (x, y) → (x + 2, y)

or possibly the simplest

rotate CCW 90° about (1, 1) (x, y) → (xc - (y - yc) , yc + (x - xc)

where (xc, yc) = (1, 1) (x, y) → (1 - (y - 1) , 1 + (x - 1)

(x, y) → (2 - y , x)

You might be interested in

Scientists have increased their ability to make observations beyond their own senses through the invention of specialized equipm

just olya [345]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A is rather a strange choice. The tools are used as extensions of our senses. That's all that technology has done. We still need to observe things for ourselves if we are to learn. I actually really do not know what this statement means. My answer reflects what I think is true. Our need to observe and think is not hindered.

B is never going to be true. We still have to test things out, even with the best tools that we have.

C: The exact opposite is true. Our knowledge of the universe has expanded beyond our belief with the better tools of technology that we have.

D: This is the opposite of C and is the answer.

5 0

2 years ago

How do you do equations.

Nesterboy [21]

Do you have a specific equation I can help you with. I can explain them better with a problem to look at?

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is the correct graph of the compound inequality 4p + 1 < −11 or 6p + 3 > 39?

mrs_skeptik [129]

The correct graph to the inequality is a number line with open dot at negative 3 with shading to the left and an open dot at 6 with shading to the right. The correct option is the second option

<h3>Linear Inequalities </h3>

From the question, we are to determine the graph for the given compound inequality

The given compound inequality is

4p + 1 < −11 or 6p + 3 > 39

Solve the inequalities separately

4p + 1 < −11

4p < -11 - 1

4p < -12

p < -12/4

p < -3

6p + 3 > 39

6p > 39 - 3

6p > 36

p > 36/6

p > 6

Thus,

p < -3 OR p > 6

Hence, the correct graph to the inequality is a number line with open dot at negative 3 with shading to the left and an open dot at 6 with shading to the right. The correct option is the second option

Learn more on Linear Inequalities here: brainly.com/question/5994230

#SPJ1

4 0

11 months ago

Can someone help me with this? Right answer gets brainliest!! :)

Sedbober [7]

I have 2 answers in mind

Answer #1:

$\frac{y}{z}$

Step-by-step explanation:

quotient means the answer to 2 things being divided so the quotient of y and z would be $\frac{y}{z}$ because there is no numerical value.

Answer #2:

Step-by-step explanation:

Usually, when a letter is left by itself in an equation it usually has an invisible one in front of it. so when dividing y by z it would equal 1/1 which is equal to one.

Hope this helps :)

6 0

2 years ago

For what values of x is f(x) = |x + 1| differentiable? I'm struggling my butt off for this course

pav-90 [236]

By definition of absolute value, you have

$f(x) = |x+1| = \begin{cases}x+1&\text{if }x+1\ge0 \\ -(x+1)&\text{if }x+1$

or more simply,

$f(x) = \begin{cases}x+1&\text{if }x\ge-1\\-x-1&\text{if }x$

On their own, each piece is differentiable over their respective domains, except at the point where they split off.

For x > -1, we have

(x + 1)' = 1

while for x < -1,

(-x - 1)' = -1

More concisely,

$f'(x) = \begin{cases}1&\text{if }x>-1\\-1&\text{if }x$

Note the strict inequalities in the definition of f '(x).

In order for f(x) to be differentiable at x = -1, the derivative f '(x) must be continuous at x = -1. But this is not the case, because the limits from either side of x = -1 for the derivative do not match:

$\displaystyle \lim_{x\to-1^-}f'(x) = \lim_{x\to-1}(-1) = -1$

$\displaystyle \lim_{x\to-1^+}f'(x) = \lim_{x\to-1}1 = 1$

All this to say that f(x) is differentiable everywhere on its domain, except at the point x = -1.

4 0

2 years ago