All categories

3 years ago

Yuhhhhhhh yu alr know the vibesss im now a expert yhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Business

2 answers:

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

............................................ NICE

Lyrx [107]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Eyyy how I wish I can Be the expert tho :<

You might be interested in

(a) Argue whether or not a firm should continue production if its MR is lower than its AVC. (b) Support your argument with expla

Delvig [45]

Answer: A firm should not continue production when its MR is lower than its AVC.

Explanation:

The goal of every firm is to minimize cost and also maximize profits and therefore the firm will operate at the output level where the marginal revenue and the marginal cost equates.

A firm should not continue production when its MR is lower than its AVC. Here, the firm will incur a higher loss during production as producing will not offset the variable cost. Therefore, it's better to shut down.

4 0

3 years ago

You are interested in valuing a 2-year semi-annual corporate coupon bond using spot rates but there are no liquid strips availab

Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

Following are the solution to this question:

Explanation:

Assume that $r_1$ will be a 12-month for the spot rate:

$\to 1.25 \% \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99 + \frac{(1.25\% \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to \frac{1.25}{100} \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99 + \frac{(\frac{1.25}{100} \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to \frac{1.25}{2} \times 0.99 + \frac{(\frac{1.25}{2} +100)}{(1+\frac{r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 + \frac{( 0.625 +100)}{(\frac{2+r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 + \frac{( 100.625)}{(\frac{2+r_1}{2})^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 + \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}=98\\\\$

$\to 0.61875 + \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}=98\\\\\to 0.61875 -98 = \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}\\\\\to -97.38125= \frac{402.5}{(2+r_1)^2}\\\\\to (2+r_1)^2= \frac{402.5}{ -97.38125}\\\\\to (2+r_1)^2= -4.13\\\\ \to r_1=3.304\%$

Assume that $r_2$ will be a 18-month for the spot rate:

$\to 1.5\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99+1.5\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{3.300\%}{2})^2}+\frac{(1.5\% \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to \frac{1.5}{100} \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99+\frac{1.5}{100} \times \frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{\frac{3.300}{100}}{2})^2}+\frac{(\frac{1.5}{100} \times \frac{100}{2}+100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\$

$\to \frac{1.5}{2} \times 0.99+\frac{1.5}{2}\times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{\frac{3.300}{100}}{2})^2}+\frac{(\frac{1.5}{2} +100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 0.7425+0.75 \times \frac{1}{(1+ \frac{\frac{3.300}{100}}{2})^2}+\frac{(0.75 +100)}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4925 \times \frac{1}{(1+0.0165)^2}+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4925 \times \frac{1}{(1.033)}+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\$

$\to 1.4925 \times 0.96+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4328+\frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}=97\\\\\to 1.4328-97= \frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}\\\\\to -95.5672= \frac{(100.75 )}{(1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3}\\\\\to (1+\frac{r_2}{2})^3= -1.054\\\\\to r_2=3.577\%$

Assume that $r_3$ will be a 18-month for the spot rate:

$\to 1.25\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times 0.99+1.25\% \times \frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+\frac{3.300\%}{2})^2}+1.25\%\times\frac{100}{2} \times \frac{1}{(1+\frac{3.577\%}{2})^3}+(1.25\% \times \frac{\frac{100}{2}+100}{(1+\frac{r_3}{2})^4})=96\\\\$

to solve this we get $r_3=3.335\%$

4 0

3 years ago

An association that Korean Americans are able to use to pool their money together and provide grants to subsidize the startup co

Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

KYES

Explanation:

KYES are clubs created by Korean Americans in which the members make a contribution and the money gathered is used to provide loans to start businesses. According to this, the answer is that an association that Korean Americans are able to use to pool their money together and provide grants to subsidize the startup costs of businesses are called KYES.

8 0

3 years ago

Elton used a decision rule that says, "only buy well-known brand names" when selecting a television set. he did not look at pric

anzhelika [568]

Answer: C) noncompensatory rule

Explanation:

The non-compensatory rule is used to describe a situation where a person does not believe that the good traits of a product in one area will compensate for perceived bad traits in another area.

For Elton, the good trait is well known brand names and the bad trait is brand names that are not well known. Even if for the brand that is not well known, the price is lower, the discount is higher or the store is well known, these still will not be enough to compensate for the bad trait of not being well known.

3 0

3 years ago

Sasha has run a small diner near the train station for the past ten years. Six months ago, a chain restaurant serving gourmet bu

fenix001 [56]

Answer:

threat of new entrants

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that force that has affected Sasha's business, from Porters five forces was the threat of new entrants. This force refers to the threat that comes from new competitors entering an industry with existing competitors. If the barrier to entry of the market is low/easy for these new companies then it creates a huge threat to the existing company's since it allows them to get established in the market fast and at a low cost.

6 0

3 years ago