If company Z is receiving a government subsidy, the government is taking money from<u> </u><u>taxpayers</u> and giving it to company Z.
If company Z is getting a tax deduction (instead of receiving a subsidy) then company Z i<u>s </u><u>paying </u><u>less in </u><u>taxes </u><u>than it would </u><u>without </u><u>the tax </u><u>deduction</u><u>.</u>
<u />
<h3>What is subsidy?</h3>
A subsidy is a government payment made directly or indirectly to individuals or businesses, usually in the form of cash or a targeted tax relief.
A subsidy, often known as a government incentive, is a type of financial assistance or support given to a certain economic sector.
Thus, the correct option is<u> taxpayers</u>, and i<u>s </u><u>paying </u><u>less in </u><u>taxes </u><u>than it would </u><u>without </u><u>the tax </u><u>deduction</u><u>.</u>
<u />
Learn more about subsidy
brainly.com/question/17136613
#SPJ1
Answer:
-Auditor
Explanation:
The auditor is responsible for conducting an independent examination of the financial statements and records of the company. he or she checks whether the company follows the accounting principles, norms, etc as prescribed and according to that he or she give the qualified or unqualified report
Therefore as per the given situation, the option a is correct
Answer:
symbolic/prestige pricing
Explanation:
Symbolic/prestige pricing occurs when consumers associate with goods based on how costly it is. If the princes of the goods are low it doesn't encourage buyers to make purchases as they seem to associate high prices with top quality.
This is why matrix charges high for its cologne. Therefore Symbolic/prestige pricing is the answer to the question.
D, if Ashley had been looking at the bargains instead of jumping right in then she probably wouldnt have had to pay so much. Which is why it's always important to do your research and never be careless/reckless with anything.
False, they just care about your money
