All categories

3 years ago

What is something that bisects

Mathematics

2 answers:

erik [133]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A bisector is something that cuts an object into two equal parts. It is applied to angles and line segments. In verb form, we say that it bisects the other object.

Nastasia [14]3 years ago

8 0

It is possible to bisect a cupcake or cookie, meaning you cut something into two.

I hope this answered your question! :)

You might be interested in

Please please open !

Tomtit [17]

Answer:

1.A 2.A 3.A 4.B 5.A 6.B

6 0

3 years ago

Write 0.216 as a rational number in lowest terms

lozanna [386]

Answer:

$=\frac{27}{125}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$0.216$

$\mathrm{Multiply\:and\:divide\:by\:10\:for\:every\:number\:after\:the\:decimal\:point.}$

$\mathrm{There\:are\:}3\mathrm{\:digits\:to\:the\:right\:of\:the\:decimal\:point,\:therefore\:multiply\:and\:divide\:by\:}1000$

$=\frac{0.216\cdot \:1000}{1000}$

$=\frac{216}{1000}$

$216,\:1000$

$\mathrm{The\:GCD\:of\:}a,\:b\mathrm{\:is\:the\:largest\:positive\:number\:that\:divides\:both\:}a\mathrm{\:and\:}b\mathrm{\:without\:a\:remainder}$

$2,\:3\mathrm{\:are\:all\:prime\:numbers,\:therefore\:no\:further\:factorization\:is\:possible}$

$=2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2\cdot \:3\cdot \:3\cdot \:3$

$2,\:5\mathrm{\:are\:all\:prime\:numbers,\:therefore\:no\:further\:factorization\:is\:possible}$

$=2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2\cdot \:5\cdot \:5\cdot \:5$

$\mathrm{The\:prime\:factors\:common\:to\:}216,\:1000\mathrm{\:are\:}$

$=2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2$

$\mathrm{Multiply\:the\:numbers:}\:2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2=8$

$=8$

$=\frac{8\cdot \:27}{8\cdot \:125}$

$\mathrm{Cancel\:the\:common\:factor:}\:8$

$=\frac{27}{125}$

Hence, the correct answer is $=\frac{27}{125}$

6 0

2 years ago

A matatu carries 14 passengers per trip. In

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

"23,520"

Step-by-step explanation:

one trip: 14 passengers

one day: 3 trips

passengers: 80

80x14= 1,120

1,120x3= 3,360

3,360x7= 23,520

6 0

3 years ago

Franklin bought a book with 90 pages. If he

BartSMP [9]

The answer is A) 60%

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following sets of numbers could not represent the three sides of a triangle?

timama [110]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In order for the sides lengths to form a triangle, the sum of the shortest two must exceed the longest.

That will not be the case for ...

{13, 16, 30}

because 13 +16 = 29 < 30.

(13, 16, 30} could not form a triangle

For more on the subject, see ...

brainly.com/question/26258903

8 0

2 years ago