Two circles<span> of </span>radius<span> 4 are </span>tangent<span> to the </span>graph<span> of y^</span>2<span> = </span>4x<span> at the </span>point<span> (</span>1<span>, </span>2<span>). ... I know how to </span>find<span> the </span>tangent<span> line from a circle and a given </span>point<span>, but ... </span>2a2=42. a2=8. a=±2√2. Then1−xc=±2√2<span> and </span>2−yc=±2√2. ... 4 from (1,2<span>), so you could </span>find these<span> centers, and from there the</span>equations<span> of the circle
</span>
We need to see the table in order to answer the question...
Answer:
Yes.
Step-by-step explanation:
As long as the individual's that have been selected as part of the study were actually selected randomly then yes. If there was no bias or other external factors affecting the probability of getting chosen then these individual's would clearly represent the entire population of Best Buy customers. Therefore, if the data gathered from these individuals results in being 68% of that population that does not buy anything then this would result in a valid claim by Best Buy.
Allen's work is not written properly so I have rearranged it as shown below:
Original problem) –8.3 + 9.2 – 4.4 + 3.7.
Step 1) −8.3 + 9.2 + 4.4 + 3.7 Additive inverse
Step 2) −8.3 + 4.4 + 9.2 + 3.7 Commutative property
Step 3) −8.3 + (4.4 + 9.2 + 3.7) Associative property
Step 4) −8.3 + 17.3
We can see that in step 1), Allen changed -4.4 into +4.4 using additive inverse. Notice that we are simplifying not eliminating -4.4 as we do in solving some equation. Hence using additive inverse is the wrong step.
Alen should have collect negative numbers together and positive numbers together.
Add the respective numbers then proceed to get the answer.
–8.3 + 9.2 – 4.4 + 3.7
= –8.3 – 4.4 + 9.2 + 3.7
= -12.7 + 12.9
= 0.2
No the gardens are not going to be the same because Jamal' s garden is bigger than marks garden
