Answer:International trade deals within countries, while channel management is a form of trade that could be within the country or outside but seeking the best form or place for the market
Explanation:
International trade is the situation where two countries do business, either long distance buying(importing) or one is selling(exporting).
While Channel management is a technique for choosing the most efficient channels to sale or market your goods and making good profit or deriving the best result from those channel chosen.
Knowing the difference between the two terms is important so you can understand where best your market is appreciated and where best to avoid selling to.
International trade deals within countries, while channel management is a form of trade that could be within the country or outside but seeking the best form or place for the market
Answer: If the United States eliminates its import quotas on Costa Rican sugar, <em><u>consumer surplus for American consumers of sugar products will rise.</u></em>
Here, the United States has finally decided to eliminates its import quotas on Costa Rican sugar. This will further allow the producer in Costa Rica to export more quantity of this commodity.
Answer:
Explanation:
Since the delivery is being attempted after the date of the contract, it is Grapes & Vines breaching the contract. Grapes & Vines’s failure to deliver on May 1 and its failure to inform Ellen of the delays a material breach releasing her from any liability under the contract. The court will most likely rule that not only has Ellen not broken the contract, that Grapes & Vines must pay her court costs due to the frivolous nature of the lawsuit.
Answer:
<em>King </em><em>George</em><em> </em><em>lll </em><em>sent </em><em>British </em><em>soldiers</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>the </em><em>colonies</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>enforce</em><em> </em><em>payment</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>taxes,</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>colonist</em><em> </em><em>sometimes</em><em> </em><em>smuggled </em><em>goods </em><em>into </em><em>colonies</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>avoid</em><em> </em><em>paying</em><em> taxes</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>The </em><em>items </em><em>were </em><em>marked </em><em>with </em><em>a </em><em>stamp </em><em>to </em><em>show </em><em>the </em><em>tax </em><em>was </em><em>paid.</em>
Answer:
For efficiency, <u>3 haircuts</u> should be given.
Only three haircuts should be given because only 3 firms have costs that are lower than the customer whose hair they are to cut.
Firm A's cost is less than Kyoto's willingness to pay so Firm A can cut.
Firm B's cost is more than Rina's willingness to pay so Firm B should not cut.
Firm C's cost is less than Jacques's willingness to pay so Firm C can cut.
Firm D's cost is less than Musashi's willingness to pay so Firm D can cut.
That makes only 3 firms that can cut therefore 3 haircuts.
The business that should cut as shown above are: