not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
*Tobacco Slavery*
What was the effect of the weakening tobacco market on slavery?
The tobacco business made bondage gainful and Virginia tobacco slave proprietors rich. It was exactly the accomplishment of this product that prompted the mass importation of stolen African work, and the tremendous abundance of old England and New England. Cigarettes, stogies, snuff, biting tobacco are simply identifications of bondage's progressing inheritance. You see it's dependable with us and it never leaves.
I haven't gotten any tobacco profits from MY family's Virginia tobacco bondage. Nope, not one dime...not even a fair say in Philip Morris' or its parent organization Altria'sannual report.
Since 1990 the tobacco business has "gave" an aggregate of $59,410,256 to lawmakers of which 74% or $44,218,744 has gone into the Republican coffers. Did the relatives of the previous tobacco slaves see one penny? Gracious, Hell no!
What was the effect of the weakening tobacco market on slavery?
I didn't state reparations, since that would imply that SOMEBODY was really SORRY for quite a long time of unpaid labor....but, this nation would preferably gas African Americans Nazi-style than pay one penny for the many years of property subjection. Nooo, ain't no one sad for JACK!
The picture of Obama with a cigarette notice back to our identity, and who brought us here, and for what reason. The tobacco is lubing a great deal of political palms in Washington, DC and it has advanced countries families like the Windsors of England and the Virginia representatives to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Tobacco has long roots in this country. Be that as it may, haha hehe, isn't that what Sambo does fo Massa. Simply smile and eat the watermelon. Hahaha, giggle.
In the Old Dominion Virginia in 1620 the principal Africans were sold to the English by the Dutch. Tobacco turned into the most beneficial agrarian item in the Virginia province; without which, the state would have fizzled. Indeed they paid each other in TOBACCO rather than cash in Colonial Virginia. Slaves were regularly purchased and sold for estate work from slave obstructs, before bars and at courthouses and stores in Spotsylvania and Stafford.
Slaves planted and collected the tobacco trim, fabricated the tobacco shipping barrels (hogshead), conveyed the tobacco harvest to the reviews distribution centers and stacked and emptied the boats planning for a sail to England. Slaves did ALL the work to advance that Virginia tobacco grower (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson et al) with no compensation and not even a "Thank You for influencing me rich" to card at Christmas.
Do you know any history of the tobacco business, the first thirteen provinces, and subjection? You can take a gander at the country's organizers like the Virginia tobacco slavers George Washington and Thomas Jefferson they resemble a tree while the subjugation is the root framework that bolsters the tree and maintains its life. Bondage was the sine qua non to America's flourishing.
Answer:
Dan Goeb Patrick
Explanation:
Dan Goeb Patrick is an American radio talk show host and a politician. He is the 42nd and current lieutenant governor of Texas, and he has been serving since January 2015.
He was born in Baltimore, Maryland, USA on April 4, 1950, and he is 69 years of age. He belongs to the Republican party.
Dan Goeb Patrick graduated from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County with a Bachelor of Arts in English, and he is the first member of his family to graduate from college.
The answer is an impervious response. An impervious response is one of the seven types of disconfirming messages. We can simply put this as "No response at all" because an impervious message fails to recognize the other person's communication attempt either via verbal or nonverbal way; failure to respond in all forms and channel.
Answer:It could happen naturally through Mutation
Explanation:
What is mutation?
Mutation is a process where by the DNA of an organism changes.
This can happen when one base of a DNA is deleted somehow through some error in the DNA system or it could also happen if a new base is introduced (insertion) into the already existing DNA system changing the sequence of the DNA or it could also happen when the base is duplicated into two bases(duplication).
These changes may result to the change in the behaviour of an organism or it may change the way the organism looks.
