Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
Answer:
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Explanation:
Don't take my word for it. Just an educated guess *shrugs*
Answer: It is a proper question
Explanation:
The witness is making a claim about what had transpired between the defendant and the plaintiff and in order for their testimony to stand, they need to have integrity such that a reasonable person can believe their testimony in this case.
In asking about the false claim that the witness had once filed, the defendant is trying to establish that the witness has no integrity and so in proving their untruthfulness, the defendant hopes to convince the court that the witness does not have enough integrity to be a witness.
If you have a platform to tell people about the gruesome effects of animal testing, you can present what actually happens during these animals short lived lives
<u>Noah ethical and moral:</u>
The Movie Noah is Ethical and Moral because the God sees how the humans treat other humans and there is no humanity left in the world he brings a flood but spares the life of Noah, his family and all the animals.
God says the evil was overpowering the good and there was no more purpose of human existence. God values goodness and hence, he spares the life of Noah after getting impressed by the good deeds he did in his life.
This movie gives us a moral value to not harm other humans and animals and only believe in goodness.
