Answer: When the law is so vast that it cant be understood by the one supposedly breaking the law, the person can be found guilty of a crime based on the interpretation as others see the law which might conflict someone elses interpretation.
Explanation: We all have a right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness but how can you restrict that by writing more laws that contradict this right?
Answer:
Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney
Explanation:
Dues and subscriptions are professional expenses. They are tax-deductible subject to the 2% Adjusted Gross Income.
Professional subscriptions refer to any fees that the person may have to pay to get his business or profession registered with a "governing body" for which a license is required.
One cannot claim tax back on professional fees and subscriptions.
Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications.
Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding
Answer:
The North Star
Explanation:
The North Star was a nineteenth-century anti-slavery newspaper published from the Talman Building in Rochester, New York by abolitionist Frederick Douglass.
Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members
Other biased sources include the following:
- Political party members of the President,
- Previous schools the current President attended,
- Family of the current President
- The political party the President belonged to,
- The special assistants to the current President, etc.
The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20646239
