-8.1
Step-by-step explanation:

<em>Times </em><em>all </em><em>by </em><em>9</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>get </em><em>rid </em><em>of </em><em>fraction</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Take </em><em>2</em><em>1</em><em>.</em><em>6</em><em> </em><em>away</em><em> </em><em>from</em><em> </em><em>both</em><em> </em><em>sides</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Divide</em><em> </em><em>by </em><em>-</em><em>4</em>
<em>
</em>
9.75 * 1.2 = 11.7
24.5 * .8 = 19.6
11.7+19.6= 31.3 minutes
hope this helped :)
Answer:
15 times
Step-by-step explanation:
If he bats 50 times, he will be expected to reach first base "30% of the time".
We simply need to find "what is 30% of 50?"
We first need to convert the percentage (30%) to decimal and then multiply that with 50 to get our answer.
Converting percentage to decimal is very simple! We divide by 100. That's it!
So, we have:
30% = 30/100 = 0.3
Now we do the multiplication:
0.3 * 50 = 15
So, the player would reach first base 15 times (out of 50 times of batting)
Answer:
37.25, 35.5, 33.75, <u>32</u>, <u>30.25</u>.
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract the first term from the second term:
35.5 - 37.25 = -1.75
Subtract the second term from the third term:
35.5 - 33.75 = -1.75
The common difference is -1.75.
To find each subsequent term, add the common difference to the current term.
33.75 + (-1.75) = 32
32 + (-1.75) = 30.25
Answer:
37.25, 35.5, 33.75, <u>32</u>, <u>30.25</u>.
Answer:
The answer is True.
Step-by-step explanation:
Sales variance is computed in same manner as cost variance that is computing both price and volume variance. However interpretation of end result will not be same. For example in material price variance if
A = actual purchase price = $ 4, B = standard purchase price= $ 5 and Qt= quantity purchased = 500 units then
Material price varaince = 500 (5-4) = 500,
This gives us favourable price variance of 500 dollars. However in sales price variance if
A = actual sales price = $ 4, B = standard sale price= $ 5 and Qt= quantity sold = 500 units then
Sale price varaince = 500 (5-4) = (500)
This gives us unfavourable sales price variance of 500 dollars.
This show that formulas to compute variances are same but sale price decrease give us un favorable variance and cost price decrease gives us favorable price variance and vice versa.